January 31, 200719 yr 6 teams in the top 10. 1. Florida 25 4 14 7 3.88 2,820 2. Tennessee 28 5 9 14 3.68 2,599 3. Texas 23 2 15 5 3.78 2,497 4. LSU 23 0 16 7 3.70 2,176 5. South Carolina 30 1 13 13 3.40 2,125 6. USC 14 4 9 1 4.21 2,078 7. Notre Dame 18 1 13 4 3.83 2,054 8. Georgia 23 0 12 10 3.39 1,903 9. Nebraska 29 0 12 16 3.38 1,874 10. Auburn 23 0 10 13 3.43 1,838 11. Oregon 27 0 12 11 3.30 1,774 12. Illinois 21 2 4 13 3.29 1,558 13. Georgia Tech 20 0 9 9 3.35 1,514 14. Clemson 22 0 7 13 3.23 1,506 15. Ohio State 14 0 11 3 3.79 1,450 16. Michigan 18 1 5 11 3.33 1,424 17. Ole Miss 25 1 5 15 3.12 1,363 18. Virginia 25 0 7 12 3.04 1,308 19. Penn State 19 0 8 7 3.21 1,269 20. Alabama 18 0 8 6 3.00 1,239 21. California 22 0 3 17 3.05 1,229 22. Oklahoma 14 1 6 6 3.50 1,217 23. Pittsburgh 23 0 5 14 3.04 1,214 24. Virginia Tech 26 1 2 15 2.85 1,199 25. Iowa 20 That is just crazy.
January 31, 200719 yr UL isn't on this list. With all the threads about new players coming in it seemed like they had a GREAT year.:sssh: Just kidding guys calm down.
January 31, 200719 yr Last year was one of the best recruiting classes in Kentucky's history, yet they couldn't crack the top 7 in the SEC. The SEC is ridiculous when it comes to football & recruiting...
January 31, 200719 yr Odd to think Illinois had the top recruiting class in the Big 10. The problem with Zook was never being able to get the kids to come... I personally think Zook is best fit for a place like Illinois.
January 31, 200719 yr UK is just out side of the top 25 isn't it???? No, not even close. They are in the 40's somewhere i believe. Ranking wise this wasnt a great class for UK but the coaches seem to have a good eye for talent tho.
January 31, 200719 yr Imagine having the 21st best recruiting class in the nation. You'd feel pretty good and be near the top of your conference right? How about 9th in the SEC. :eek: That's disheartening.
January 31, 200719 yr This is nothing new...the SEC almost always has a large number in the top 20-25...I remember looking at some recruiting rankings last year and UK's class was somewhere around #40, which was good for #10 or 11 in the conference.
January 31, 200719 yr Am I wrong or is The "U" absent from this ranking? And so is "Free Shoes University"!
January 31, 200719 yr Hasn't U of L been hovering in the 35-40 range again this year, which is their usual place? And which is nothing to scoff at as they seem to have done pretty well with recruiting classes in that range.
January 31, 200719 yr 4 of the top 8 in the SEC East. Amazing. This doesn't help UK's chances of trying to move up the ladder in the SEC East.
January 31, 200719 yr This doesn't help UK's chances of trying to move up the ladder in the SEC East. Again, that's nothing new...UK is going to have to maximize their talent. They aren't going to out-recruit SEC heavyweights (Florida, Georgia, Tennessee) and a Steve Spurrier coached South Carolina based on one winning season. If they continue to build on what they've done, then they might get a little more competitive in the recruiting wars. Until then, they're going to have to find "diamonds-in-the-rough" and then get the max out of them on the field, much like U of L has done with some players...
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.