Never in history(Not even Obama) has the decked been stacked against a President Elect like Trump has had it.

Fox?

 

NBC, MSNBC, CBS, ...

Podesta joined in today.

 

He needs to get some pizza, pasta, play some pong and hold a spirit dinner or two. (But stay out of Spain and Clem's place).

 

Here's what I can't make sense of. You believe the conspiracy theory that Clinton and Podesta are running a child sex ring out of a pizza parlor in DC, but you suddenly have an impossibly high threshold for evidence that Russia would try to be subversive toward the American government, which, between RT, harboring Snowden, etc., is not much of a secret.

Never in history(Not even Obama) has the decked been stacked against a President Elect like Trump has had it.

 

Or for :sssh:

 

In all seriousness Trump created a great deal of this dissension and turmoil with the campaign he ran.

Or for :sssh:

 

In all seriousness Trump created a great deal of this dissension and turmoil with the campaign he ran.

 

Trump ran a successful campaign Hellcats. Winner=Trump. Loser=Hillary.

Edited December 13, 20169 yr by Jumper_Dad

Not that it matters.

 

The FBI; the leader of Wikileaks - who was the conduit of the leaks, Julian Assage; a former UK ambassador, Craig Murray, who says he met the leaker and knows who it is - have all said - the Russians were not involved in exposing Podesta's emails.

 

 

This is like child's game of snipe hunting.

 

Referenes:

 

Former British Ambassador Claims Source Of Podesta Leaks "Comes From Within Washington" | Zero HedgeJulian Assange New Interview: Podesta Email Leaks are Not From Russia and Much More – Web Line News

 

 

But we are to believe the CIA has the goods. Lead by one of the shadiest operatives in the agency history - John Brennen (his company was part of the passport breakins, etc.) and an agency who, by law, is not to conduct operations within the borders of the country and has stated that it has mis-information as part of its mission.

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]59505[/ATTACH]

 

Ahhh, Casey. The man behind the Iranian Contra scandal.

Here's what I can't make sense of. You believe the conspiracy theory that Clinton and Podesta are running a child sex ring out of a pizza parlor in DC, but you suddenly have an impossibly high threshold for evidence that Russia would try to be subversive toward the American government, which, between RT, harboring Snowden, etc., is not much of a secret.

 

Strange, eh.

 

The heroes for the elite is the usually evil CIA and the elite are even taking up for those poor defense industry giants Boeing and Lockheed.

 

Podesta's emails were leaked - that according to multiple sources. The Russians did not need to hack them. Did they? Probably so. Just like the Brits probably did, the Israelis probably did, the Chinese probably did. As noted - hacking the DNC was not hard to hack and some poor Bulgarian is probably dead in prison as the fall guy. But probably all the main players were reading the emails the day they went out.

 

Would a superpower government really, actively use intelligence and risk giving away what they have and what they know? Most countries take espionage seriously. They do not recklessly use gained information in the open and risk exposing sources, exposing tactics, exposing people. Only our country seems to have officials that were that careless.

 

So we have had to live through:

 

a) False polls

b) Fake news claims by entities that are proven and repeated publishers of 'fake news'.

c) Recounts from a entity that had no reason to do them unless it was acting as an operative.

d) The 'She won the popular vote'.

e) Recounts that exposed massive corruption that favored the Dem candidate.

f) Threatened electors.

g) The Russians.

 

What is next? Did the elite/Dems accept the result and reconcile for the better of the country - obviously not.

Ahhh, Casey. The man behind the Iranian Contra scandal.

 

And attempt to turn the American public against Libya via....you guessed it...fake news and mis-information.

 

The CIA is a nasty organization. They gave us MKULTRA, Mena drug-running out of Mena, Arkansas (Iran-contra related and under the watch of the VP and then governor of Arkansas). It was their 'annex' at Benghazi that no one knew about and of course they 'helped' the rebels in Libya. They are supposed to be dirty. But be dirty outside the borders.

 

Brennen has gotten a free ride during his tenure. Seems untouchable. And now we have this.

I find it funny that some feel that it would be better if the public never learned who Hillary truly is, how the media is in bed with the Democrats and what a slimy campaign the Democrats ran. The truth came out and the voters punished her for it.

Now wasn't the CIA helped to be formed by former Nazi SS and Gestapo agents after WW2.

This stuff would be funny if it was not so despicable by the Dems (and the MSM) to do ANYTHING possible to make Trump look not legitimate. So Obama and HRC are saying that while we were in charge, we did such a terrible job of protecting the country against Russian hackers, that we need an investigation into the election because they may have stole it for Trump? Is that what they are implying...that their incompetence in protecting our systems led to this? Amazing that the MSM did not have any trouble with HRC's emails that were most likely hacked and did everything they could to cover up WikiLeaks when it was in their interest to do so but NOW they are outraged about possible Russian hacks...

 

I always thought the Dems and MSM were hypocritical but they have now become the absolute definition of hypocritical. That being said, we should be doing investigations into how incompetent our country seems to be in combating other countries' hacking. To link it to this election though is just ridiculous...other countries have hacked into the White House, Pentagon and other govt agencies too.

Also, I guess it is OK for Obama to go to England and urge people to vote against the Brexit or for Obama's whole team to try to get Bebe ousted in Israel?? That is REAL interference in an election. Funny that in ALL cases (England, Israel and now the US), Obama lost...rough year for the man...

I expect 34 hearings and 7.1 million dollars spent on the investigation. :lol2:

Also, I guess it is OK for Obama to go to England and urge people to vote against the Brexit or for Obama's whole team to try to get Bebe ousted in Israel?? That is REAL interference in an election. Funny that in ALL cases (England, Israel and now the US), Obama lost...rough year for the man...

 

Yeah no kidding. Funny how butt hurt the Dems are.

They should have spent more time and had more security to protect against such things.

I find it funny that some feel that it would be better if the public never learned who Hillary truly is, how the media is in bed with the Democrats and what a slimy campaign the Democrats ran. The truth came out and the voters punished her for it.

 

63 million did

66 million didn't :lol2: