Ok fine then you want me to give them an F.

 

No. But why are u getting offensive on one of the largest class A teams.

Ok fine then you want me to give them an F.

 

What does a grade have to due with injuries?

I give an underachieving Beechwood a "B"

I give an underachieving Beechwood a "B"

 

BINGO

This thread is for grades. If you want to have tangent debates start a new thread or take it to PMs.

Best that BW was not in this classroom - B

No title is underachieving! It was all but a given that they would finally get a title once the Barbarians from the West left and they didn't get it done and lost by 21 to a 5-8 Cov Cath to pad that B.

For those giving this effort an A that are BW fans is disappointing! Have the Mayfield beatings lowered standards and expectations?

This thread is for grades. If you want to have tangent debates start a new thread or take it to PMs.

 

Too old and wrong sex for PMS!

Best that BW was not in this classroom - B

No title is underachieving! It was all but a given that they would finally get a title once the Barbarians from the West left and they didn't get it done and lost by 21 to a 5-8 Cov Cath to pad that B.

For those giving this effort an A that are BW fans is disappointing! Have the Mayfield beatings lowered standards and expectations?

 

Not even a single comment is very telling

Not even a single comment is very telling

 

My grade is posted above. This team reached its potential. I never bought into the clear favorite talk for 2015 Beechwood. That was people just assuming Beechwood wins since Mayfield moved up to 2A. The 2015 team was not as good as the 2014 team. Disappointing was 2014. That 2014 team is one of the most talented Beechwood teams in recent years and them losing to Mayfield was much more disappointing than the 2015 team losing in the title game. I stick by A- for 2015 Beechwood and give the B to 2014 Beechwood, the more talented team that did not achieve to its potential.

My grade is posted above. This team reached its potential. I never bought into the clear favorite talk for 2015 Beechwood. That was people just assuming Beechwood wins since Mayfield moved up to 2A. The 2015 team was not as good as the 2014 team. Disappointing was 2014. That 2014 team is one of the most talented Beechwood teams in recent years and them losing to Mayfield was much more disappointing than the 2015 team losing in the title game. I stick by A- for 2015 Beechwood and give the B to 2014 Beechwood, the more talented team that did not achieve to its potential.

 

I honestly think this years team was as good as 2014. But I have a question do you think 2014 and the 2015 teams were as good as 2011?

I honestly think this years team was as good as 2014. But I have a question do you think 2014 and the 2015 teams were as good as 2011?

 

When you figure that out could you tell me if 1996 was as good as 1984?

When you figure that out could you tell me if 1996 was as good as 1984?

 

Considering I am not familiar with Beechwood as to my question or born not born yet until 1986. So I was just wanting a home faithful answer.

When you figure that out could you tell me if 1996 was as good as 1984?

Guru, your getting off thread subject. You got PMS? See post #20. LOL

Not even a single comment is very telling

 

Yes it is, and in a way that is obviously over your head.

Yes it is, and in a way that is obviously over your head.

 

Come on now 75, I never claimed to be the sharpest tool in the shed but I am very good at getting you guys talking, that's all I was up too