February 22, 201412 yr I thought the ball changed direction and its rotation also changed. The missed goaltending call was the most egregious of the game, I thought. That was definitely goaltending by UC and wasn't called. On the ball off Smith, the angle from the corner seemed to show the ball missed the UC player but it was so close I wouldn't swear to it either hitting him or missing him.
February 22, 201412 yr I thought the most egregious call was the no-call on calling timeout with none left.
February 22, 201412 yr Close second was the no-call on the missed dunk by Trezl early in the game, but (at least?) that had a make-up call on the other end. That game was FULL of make-up calls. Pretty poor effort by the crew both ways.
February 22, 201412 yr Or maybe it was the review of the review? There was actually a lot to pick from.
February 22, 201412 yr For the sake of objectivity, I'll throw in that time Trezl could have been charged with assault was also a no-call.
February 22, 201412 yr Close second was the no-call on the missed dunk by Trezl early in the game, but (at least?) that had a make-up call on the other end. That game was FULL of make-up calls. Pretty poor effort by the crew both ways. Couldn't believe that wasn't a foul at the beginning of the game. Refs were pretty terrible the the way around. The first half might have been one of the ugliest halves of bball that I've watched all year, but that is how UC likes to play.
February 22, 201412 yr For the sake of objectivity, I'll throw in that time Trezl could have been charged with assault was also a no-call. You forgot awarding the bonus on a player control foul. That crew was the worst I've ever seen. Both ways...
February 22, 201412 yr I thought the most egregious call was the no-call on calling timeout with none left. If I am not mistaken, a player signalling timeout when there are no timeouts is not an automatic technical. The official was probably aware they were out of timeouts so he didn't give them the timeout. If the official awards the timeout and then finds the team has no timeouts, then it is a technical.
February 22, 201412 yr You forgot awarding the bonus on a player control foul. That crew was the worst I've ever seen. Both ways... If you are talking about the Kilpatrick call late in the game, are you saying it was player control because the official originally signaled it that way?
February 22, 201412 yr If you are talking about the Kilpatrick call late in the game, are you saying it was player control because the official originally signaled it that way? It was a charge. No bonus on a player control foul. Should have been UL ball out of bounds...
February 22, 201412 yr I didn't get to watch the game and the DVR didn't record it so all I'm going off of is what I saw on Twitter. But what happened on the review of a review? I saw multiple people mention it. And heard the postgame where Chuck asked Mick about the refs going to the monitor four times. What happened there? BTW is there somewhere I can watch an archive of the game? Even though UC lost I'd like to see it.
February 22, 201412 yr It was a charge. No bonus on a player control foul. Should have been UL ball out of bounds... If the ball left his hands before the contact, is it still a player control foul?
February 22, 201412 yr If the ball left his hands before the contact, is it still a player control foul? I believe it is unless UofL gained possession before contact.
February 22, 201412 yr Nobody noticed the Cincy rebounder being pulled out of bounds by the Cardinal? That gave cards chance for Russ Mith.
February 22, 201412 yr If the ball left his hands before the contact, is it still a player control foul? Yes...
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.