February 23, 201412 yr ^It was a super close play, and 100 people could see it a 100 different ways. I still wouldn't swear one way or the other on whether it hit the UC player. My opinion from what I have seen is it didn't hit the UC player. I agree that it is not perfectly clear and that opinions can vary.
February 23, 201412 yr I still wouldn't swear one way or the other on whether it hit the UC player. My opinion from what I have seen is it didn't hit the UC player. I agree that it is not perfectly clear and that opinions can vary. Like I said that one angle I'm referring to, I only saw like once or twice. On all the other angles, I agree that it didn't look like it touched the UC players foot.
February 23, 201412 yr didn't rule change that if player was in the air, he could not be awarded a time out? sorry missed page where this was discussed
February 23, 201412 yr didn't rule change that if player was in the air, he could not be awarded a time out? sorry missed page where this was discussed It changed a couple of years ago. The player in question in yesterday's game was not in the air.
February 25, 201412 yr If only it were relevant. Oh but it is. It was there, but not here. I get it. Too easy.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.