I am getting some more popcorn just in case you two have a few more endings...

 

:popcorn:

Quickslick take off your red glasses. Clyde has it right. You may be next! After the hiring of this AD and her husband. no one is safe

Quickslick take off your red glasses. Clyde has it right. You may be next! After the hiring of this AD and her husband. no one is safe

 

I must know you .... because I have been wearing my red sunglasses all week (probably because I got them last week ... the new hasn't worn off yet).

 

Even if Clyde has it right ... it isn't because he heard it from the actual person who said it (which makes it hearsay).

 

At the end of the day ... I love Beechwood ... and everyone there (including the people who don't like me).

Things could be a lot worse for everyone.

Perfect job for Blevins or Bowman to get their feet wet.

 

Please, enough of the Bowman and Blevins show.

 

Robin Hood

Q, I will end it this way.

 

Your claim that it is conjecture would be true if there wasnt a person on the other end of the call from Ft Mitchell.

 

Its amazing what you can find out when you ask. According to another AD I have a feeling there was more than this call made to a few coaches.

Cmon, there has to be more. This is just getting good.

 

Robin Hood

My guess is this is Rick Shumate.

 

My guess as well.

 

This is the name I've heard...also applied for Walton job. These are FACTS.

Even if Clyde has it right ... it isn't because he heard it from the actual person who said it (which makes it hearsay).

 

.

 

Two people are on a phone call. Which one or ones do I have to hear it from to have it be true in your book?

Two people are on a phone call. Which one or ones do I have to hear it from to have it be true in your book?

 

Geesh Clyde ... I know we went to the same high school ... but at the end of the day ... I didn't realize that the quality was so much higher in the 90's.

 

Two people on a phone call ... blah, blah, blah.

But ... I will go ahead and spell it out .. again.

 

Scenario 1: Principal, hiring/firing authority FROM Beechwood call your "friend" ... your friend tells you that the person FROM Beechwood called them to gauge their interest in a position that is currently filled ...

 

Then YOUR FRIEND TELLS You that this happened ... you take that as truth (even though you really have no way of knowing because you haven't spoken to the principal or hiring/firing authority). You proceed to tell that story over and over ... HEARSAY.

 

Scenario 2: Same story ... but ... YOU (meaning Clyde) talk to the person from Beechwood who made the call to your "friend" and they CONFIRM that they called your "friend" to gauge their interest = FACT.

 

Remember the football deal ... where you "heard" a story ... that pointed the finger at a certain staff? Same thing. You "heard" it from someone. Same thing here ... your "friend" told you a story .. that you choose to take as fact. Guess what ... if it wasn't confirmed by the person who made the call ... then it still falls as hearsay.

 

Like I said before ... if you tell me that you talked to Ben, or someone in the position of authority .. and THEY CONFIRMED your story ... I will apologize to you everyday for the rest of your life .. and admit that I was wrong.

 

Did your buddy tape record the call? Play it for us ... again ... I will deliver my apology daily for the rest of your life.

 

The fact of the matter is this ... I have no clue what happened.

You think you know what happened ... because someone told you a story that you can not verify (or haven't verified) from both sides.

 

It gets old Clyde .. you throw this stuff out there ... you think it will stick because you or one of your buddies is the source.

 

At the end of the day ... when you are challenged to prove your story ... you continue to say "100% confirmed" ..

 

Well ... guess what ... my Conner math is obviously better than yours ... because the most you could truly claim would be 50% confirmed.

 

So ... keep on saying "100% confirmed" ... like I said before .. you haven't confirmed your story with anyone at Beechwood ... so continue to destroy your credibility ... just makes it easier for me.

 

And for the record ... I will say this one last time ... I have no clue who did what. It would not bother me at all if other people have inside information here. I have plenty to keep me busy.

 

But the disinformation campaign that you wage with constant hearsay is getting old.

 

I have a hard time believing that you will ever be in the Beechwood circle of trust with your history .... (see ... you make it way too easy).

Q, I'm not sure what "history" of "disinformation"I have with BW. Can you point me to where that's true or is just "hearsay?"

 

Your answer says it all.

 

99.99% of people will say that if I talked to ONE of the TWO on the phone call that's good enough. 0.1% (you) don't think that's enough. I can live with that.

I am going to run out of popcorn.

 

And on a side note quickslick, even your scenario #2 could be considered hearsay. Clyde would have heard the administrator say it to him after the fact, he didn't witness/overhear the conversation which would then make it fact.

Q, I'm not sure what "history" of "disinformation"I have with BW. Can you point me to where that's true or is just "hearsay?"

 

Your answer says it all.

 

99.99% of people will say that if I talked to ONE of the TWO on the phone call that's good enough. 0.1% (you) don't think that's enough. I can live with that.

 

I could sit here all night ... and let you hang yourself .... it would be much easier I am sure.

 

Continue to back away from the football scouting lie .... that puts you in the same category as the people that you got the story from (and guess what ... you passed that sucker through here more than a few times ... verdict: GUILTY)

 

And if you are in the habit of ... and admit that you and everyone else only listen to ONE SIDE of a story ... and you can live with that ... I am pretty sure that you are the one with a problem.

 

According to your genius theory .. my brother and father could have a conversation on the phone. My brother tells you that my Dad does not love me ... and because ONE PERSON in a two person conversation told you that ... you say that 99.99% of people would consider that fact?

 

How about this ... I call you on the phone and say that I think you are a great guy ... you get off the phone and call your buddy and tell him that I called you and said you were a jerk ... are you really trying to say that 99.99% would say "well .. that's what Clyde told me .. so it has to be good enough?"

 

I don't even know how to respond to that .... if I ever live my life like that ... I hope God takes me out of my misery.

 

I think that the problem is ... is that you are like that .. and have proven it with your rumors and hearsay time and time again.

If you can look at yourself in the mirror ... good for you ... you have so much to be proud of.

I am going to run out of popcorn.

 

And on a side note quickslick, even your scenario #2 could be considered hearsay. Clyde would have heard the administrator say it to him after the fact, he didn't witness/overhear the conversation which would then make it fact.

 

Come on man .. this is the 21st century (I think) ... popcorn is a 30 second drive away.

I see your point ... I thought that I did a decent job of stating that both sides confirmed the conversation ... but .. I am, after all, a Conner graduate ... which means things will always come a little tougher to me.

Come on man .. this is the 21st century (I think) ... popcorn is a 30 second drive away.

I see your point ... I thought that I did a decent job of stating that both sides confirmed the conversation ... but .. I am, after all, a Conner graduate ... which means things will always come a little tougher to me.

 

I switched to a Bourbon and Coke.

 

I understand what you mean.

 

Not to take sides, because I am really enjoying this, but I think Clyde has accurate information on this one.

 

Finally, experience has taught me that often the non-school version of the "facts" is more accurate than the school version of the "facts."

I think that the problem is ... is that you are like that .. and have proven it with your rumors and hearsay time and time again.

If you can look at yourself in the mirror ... good for you ... you have so much to be proud of.

 

Again, I'll wait for the rumors and hearsay and where I've been wrong.

 

Why would the candidate lie? Why would he lie BEFORE it's even known by the masses that there's an opening? Did he just get lucky with his lie?