Wrong, Chad only played one year at Summit View.

 

You may be right, but if so the banners in the gym are wrong. Was in there earlier in year and his name is on both football banners they have flying. Its irrelevant, bottom line is they had two consecutive undefeated seasons, and that was the nucleus of those great SK teams. I have no clue, but I would assume several of those kids are still playing in college

As for BW being developmental, that's laughable and you know it. I would guess, and I could be wrong, that BW has more kids playing college football today than SK does, and I will guarantee that to be true if you use a per capita analysis.

 

If you do a per capita analysis wouldn't you have to include the entire population base that Beechwood draws kids from?

If you do a per capita analysis wouldn't you have to include the entire population base that Beechwood draws kids from?

 

Not to mention that Twenhofel won the championship soon after the two SVMS teams won.

If you do a per capita analysis wouldn't you have to include the entire population base that Beechwood draws kids from?

 

So what "population base" would that be?

Once again, I would like to point out the extreme hypocrisy that you live in Boone County and open enroll your kid out of district to SK.

 

Its not hypocrisy when the parent is employed by the school district!

 

My goodness! jolmstead .... you have got to be kidding me!!! You have been whining all year about kids not playing in their district and now I read that your own child is an out of district student. If that is true, you have zero credibility in this discussion and it makes all your 100+ posts on this topic look absolutely ridiculous. I am stunned and SMH so hard I may get a headache. Come on, man. Get real.

So what "population base" would that be?

 

No clue. However, if there are any kids part of the denominator, the population they come from would have to be part of the numerator. Or is it the other way around? :lol: Anyway you get the idea.

My goodness! jolmstead .... you have got to be kidding me!!! You have been whining all year about kids not playing in their district and now I read that your own child is an out of district student. If that is true, you have zero credibility in this discussion and it makes all your 100+ posts on this topic look absolutely ridiculous. I am stunned and SMH so hard I may get a headache. Come on, man. Get real.

 

WOW!!!!

My goodness! jolmstead .... you have got to be kidding me!!! You have been whining all year about kids not playing in their district and now I read that your own child is an out of district student. If that is true, you have zero credibility in this discussion and it makes all your 100+ posts on this topic look absolutely ridiculous. I am stunned and SMH so hard I may get a headache. Come on, man. Get real.

 

Not exactly VOR. I've been whining about athletic motivated transfers, recruiting at the middle school level and being supported by coaches that you ultimately conspire to compete against. That is a little different from a kid following their parent to a school! I'm sure you have faculty at your place that brought their out of district kids with them! Its even more understandable when the parent in question still holds multiple athletic records at the school.

Not exactly VOR. I've been whining about athletic motivated transfers, recruiting at the middle school level and being supported by coaches that you ultimately conspire to compete against. That is a little different from a kid following their parent to a school! I'm sure you have faculty at your place that brought their out of district kids with them! Its even more understandable when the parent in question still holds multiple athletic records at the school.

 

What does this have to do with it? Did you just want to try and impress us? I would argue that it goes against your point that your Son is not there for Athletics. Maybe he can take down some of the old man's records.

 

I feel compelled to ask... If you work at the school and you went to school there, then why do you live in another school district? Especially when you clearly like it and support it. I don't get it.

 

We definitely have kids that came with their faculty parents, but we aren't the ones crying and complaining about transfers and tuition athletes

 

VOR is completely correct. You have no leg to stand on with the argument.

What does this have to do with it? Did you just want to try and impress us? I would argue that it goes against your point that your Son is not there for Athletics. Maybe he can take down some of the old man's records.

 

I feel compelled to ask... If you work at the school and you went to school there, then why do you live in another school district? Especially when you clearly like it and support it. I don't get it.

 

We definitely have kids that came with their faculty parents, but we aren't the ones crying and complaining about transfers and tuition athletes

 

VOR is completely correct. You have no leg to stand on with the argument.

 

Its not dad that is the SK alum and record holder. The job came looking for the coach and faculty member, not the other way around. There was no athletic or academic motivation what so ever. It was simply a matter of convience.

To OSD's comment above about Beechwood supporters not crying about students choosing to go to another school, I know this may be hard for you to believe jolmstead, but the current senior class at Beechwood lost about a half dozen freshmen who would have been starting players in football to other schools for a variety of reasons. It was strange for them all to hit at one time, but they did. I don't believe there was one post on this site complaining about it. Have you heard anyone from Beechwood complain because Matthew Way, Cov Cath's excellent starting safety, went to Beechwood till his freshman year and then left to go to CCH? No, because we recognize that just like you, families may choose to send their children to an out of district or different school for personal reasons and that is just fine. Question motivation or timing all you want, but your family is not different from the families you have been complaining about. Regardless of the circumstances or the motivation, the facts are the facts. An out of district student is an out of district student.

Its not dad that is the SK alum and record holder. The job came looking for the coach and faculty member, not the other way around. There was no athletic or academic motivation what so ever. It was simply a matter of convience.

 

Fair enough, but IMO it does preclude you from commenting on Transfers.

 

Also, why do you assume all of the players that transfer to Beechwood are Athletically-Motivated?

No clue. However, if there are any kids part of the denominator, the population they come from would have to be part of the numerator. Or is it the other way around? :lol: Anyway you get the idea.

 

Sure, but you also have to count all of Kenton County for SK as well, and according to jolmstead, all of Boone County as well.

Not exactly VOR. I've been whining about athletic motivated transfers, recruiting at the middle school level and being supported by coaches that you ultimately conspire to compete against. That is a little different from a kid following their parent to a school! I'm sure you have faculty at your place that brought their out of district kids with them! Its even more understandable when the parent in question still holds multiple athletic records at the school.

 

# "What I perceive, with absolutely no facts to base it on, as athletically motivated transfers"

You may be right, but if so the banners in the gym are wrong. Was in there earlier in year and his name is on both football banners they have flying. Its irrelevant, bottom line is they had two consecutive undefeated seasons, and that was the nucleus of those great SK teams. I have no clue, but I would assume several of those kids are still playing in college

 

Nope wrong again, Chad is on the 2006 Banner, his younger brother Cory is on the 2007 banner. At least your consistently wrong.