Trinity alum

As far as I know, no one has refused anyone. I'm not sure there has ever been contact.

I LOVE this guy. A fine example of all we hold dear in an X-man.

How did that game turn out? What happened to him in the fourth quarter?

Not if you are the right shade of green. Then, life is good.

Not a down has been played. Until I see it on the field, I'm not sure that 2012 will be as good as 2011. To the question, no. Keep us in with everyone else. That way everyone gets to participate in talking about how great we are.

If you had Dennis Esterle three times you are a lucky guy (I'm not sure I thought so at the time). I also had him three years. We were by far the best prepared math students at my college. He made freshman calc an easy A. The loss of the priests and nuns has made the schools a lot more expensive. We have also had to be more competitive in our pay structure to attract and keep great teachers. It's sort of strange. I think someone was trying to stir something up by starting this thread. What it stirred for me is great feelings about what a bargain Trinity and the girls schools were for me, my brothers, my sisters, my nephews, my nieces, my sons and my daughter. Thanks for starting the thread Impartial.

At Trinity I think that any of the above is okay. There is a discount if it is all paid once, in advance. You also have the option to start paying as early as the sixth grade and lock in a rate.

A bargain at twice the price.

The first time I saw him run my only knock on him was that he went down at first contact. Not anymore. He is flat out strong. That, along with speed, quickness and good reads makes one impressive back.

We will be well represented, but look for a hostile crowd. Any team from Louisville faces a lot of hostility at Rupp and against BE you add in a UK conmmit. This game will hinge on Nathan staying out of foul trouble. If he does, it's win and advance.

I am not suggesting, I heard. You can say that he wouldn't allow what I heard. There are only two choices. Either they chose not to stop their students or they couldn't stop their students. Either one is disturbing.

The Trinity students did do a little ribbing. They chanted "Little Brother", "Just like football", "Where's your swim team" and that old reliable "Na Na Na Hey Hey". Sorry, but that stuff isn't even close to what was coming out of X.

I think you can teach it, but you have to try. I didn't see anyone from X trying to do anything about it. At the Trinity end they were very active in making sure our kids didn't get out of line. The X administrators could have stopped it anytime they wanted to. I have to tell you that if the Trinity kids had acted that way without any attempt to stop them, I would be asking some tough questions of the people that charge a lot of money to teach these kids to act better than that. I know a lot of St X people. They are better than that. I hope they are asking the administrators at X why they allowed that stuff to go on.

I tend to think that kids will be kids. They don't always use great judgement. The administrators at X that let it go on are at fault and should be held responsible. Contrast it with Dr. Mullin, Dan Zoeller and others walking the Trinity side and keeping the kids in line. I hope that the kids at X aren't learning that their school tolerates that behaviour.

I was more than a little disappointed that the X administration did NOTHING to slow the really out of line cheers from their students. Maybe they think that was appropriate behavior. Congrats to the Trinity team, students and administration for a job well done.

It will be on 970 AM or Sports Broadcasts

Good question. Don't want the loss is my guess.

It is really funny since my guess is that there is at least as much money at Ballard as there is at Trinity. Oh well, it gives their football team time to start getting ready for the Trinity game next season. Oh wait, they won't play us in that sport either.

They look like just what they are, Trinity students. That's enough to make any young man very proud.

That makes it double sweet.

I couldn't get to Bellarmine until 4:30, so I didn't get in. Hated to miss it.

Since Beatty arrived it is 9 championships to 2. Seven of those predate this years Juniors. So yes, X is a firm No 2. It goes back to long before Beatty arrived. It goes back to 1968. X has been two for most of that time. They will stay there.

NO chance it will ever happen. We aren't interested in going down that road.

X has been quite content to be second best for most of the last forty-five years. When the current group of very good players graduates, X will go back to being a much closer second. When they are a close second they can convince themselves that they are on top. Facts won't matter. As long as they are close enough to convince themselves, that will be good enough for them.

And then he gave the points back by getting a T for his behavior after the dunk. Since he gave the points back that dunk didn't do his team much good.