December 28, 201114 yr I'm still trying to figure out how the people rushing to buy their guns and ammo believe the POTUS is going to overturn the Constitution. That is what I am trying to figure out.
December 28, 201114 yr I don't know. Shoot all the 2nd supporters? In all seriousness, I just love the "Well he hasn't done anything yet, but just you wait until next term" Chicken Little stuff. Sounds to me like they already know Obama is going to win again. Yet, even though they know he'll win there is a new thread everyday talking about how bad he is doing. I'm so confused.
December 28, 201114 yr I don't know. Shoot all the 2nd supporters? In all seriousness, I just love the "Well he hasn't done anything yet, but just you wait until next term" Chicken Little stuff. "I just want you to know that we are working on it," Brady recalled the president telling them. "We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar."
December 28, 201114 yr Sounds to me like they already know Obama is going to win again. Yet, even though they know he'll win there is a new thread everyday talking about how bad he is doing. I'm so confused.I don't know that and certainly hope he doesn't. Not only for gun laws.
December 28, 201114 yr Administration officials said talk of executive orders or agency action are among a host of options that President Barack Obama and his advisers are considering. “The purpose of these discussions is to be a productive exchange of good ideas from folks across the spectrum,” one official said. “We think that’s a good place to start.”
December 28, 201114 yr I'm still trying to figure out how the people rushing to buy their guns and ammo believe the POTUS is going to overturn the Constitution.I want to be clear that I do not think the POTUS will or even can overturn the Constitution. However that doesn't mean he can't try to regulate guns and ammo to the point that the average citizen won't be able to afford or even have available more than a single shot .22
December 28, 201114 yr I don't care how many rounds. If you are a law abiding competent citizen, buy whatever you are allowed to legally. But I don't have a problem if they limit the purchase of these types of weapons either and I don't consider that a violation of the 2nd Amendment.Then why ask the original question if you don't care?
December 28, 201114 yr I'm still trying to figure out how the people rushing to buy their guns and ammo believe the POTUS is going to overturn the Constitution. His track record so far is just to ignore it. Since he gets away with that he does not need to overturn it. http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/budget/201245-obama-says-he-wont-be-bound-by-guantanamo-gun-control-portions-of-omnibus President Obama said Friday he will not be bound by at least 20 policy riders in the 2012 omnibus bill funding the government, including provisions pertaining to Guantanamo Bay and gun control. So he signs a law and then openly says he will not follow the law.
December 28, 201114 yr His track record so far is just to ignore it. Since he gets away with that he does not need to overturn it. http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/budget/201245-obama-says-he-wont-be-bound-by-guantanamo-gun-control-portions-of-omnibus So he signs a law and then openly says he will not follow the law. So is LaPierre lying, or is there a better word that describes what he is saying?
December 28, 201114 yr A standard hunting rifle is chambered for a .30-06 round, which if we are going to use a metric designation for for the sake of standardization is 7.62 x 85mm(diameter of bullet by overall length of cartidge), or even the .308 round which is 7.62 x 51 mm. The standard round of an M-16 is 5.56 x 45 mm, this is a smaller round with less powder behind it simply by the dimensions. Which is the more "high powered" round? If you are deer hunting a 5.56 is not going to stop a deer nearly as well as either of the other rounds mentioned. Yet as far as the impact of the bullet is concerned the other two are more powerful. What is the standard you use to say what is, or isn't allowed? Why should I, if I truly enjoy shooting as a hobby be prevented from having magazines of whatever size I want as long as the weapons themselves are not in violation of any laws? Many civilian weapons look like their military counterparts, yet outside of the round they fire and some inner workings they do not have the same mechanisms internally to make them near the threat that their military versions are. I don't see the harm in magazines of a 30 rounds or so being allowed. Now if we are talking belt fed weapons or fully automatic ones then that is a different story and those types of weapons are regulated far differently. Fully automatic weapons require different licensing, stamps and tracking than semi-automatic or single shot weapons do. As such if you own a weapon that fires more than one round per trigger pull then you are required to have a Class III license which has all sorts of things to go along with it that you are required to do. All items which fit that description have to be registered with the ATF, all buyers must register obtain approval from the ATF, obtain a signature from the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in their area(who can refuse to sign it which will prevent the purchase), pass an even more extensive background check than is required for most firearms, submit a photograph, fingerprints, fully register the firearm and receive written permission from the ATF in order to move the weapon across state lines and pay a tax. Actually to buy a full auto you don't have to have a class III lic. You do a butt load of paper work and pay $200 per gun but as long as you are approved you get your gun. To sell full auto weapons you have to have the class III lic.
December 28, 201114 yr I want to be clear that I do not think the POTUS will or even can overturn the Constitution. However that doesn't mean he can't try to regulate guns and ammo to the point that the average citizen won't be able to afford or even have available more than a single shot .22 Ahh yes....gotta keep cheap guns and ammo out there, or there will be anarchy!
December 28, 201114 yr Actually to buy a full auto you don't have to have a class III lic. You do a butt load of paper work and pay $200 per gun but as long as you are approved you get your gun. To sell full auto weapons you have to have the class III lic. Outside of requiring the license, everything else I posted regarding that subject was correct. all buyers must register obtain approval from the ATF, obtain a signature from the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in their area(who can refuse to sign it which will prevent the purchase), pass an even more extensive background check than is required for most firearms, submit a photograph, fingerprints, fully register the firearm and receive written permission from the ATF in order to move the weapon across state lines and pay a tax.
December 28, 201114 yr Outside of requiring the license, everything else I posted regarding that subject was correct. I was only correcting the lic part. Sorry if came off as that I was disagreeing with the rest, that wasn't my intention.
December 28, 201114 yr Ahh yes....gotta keep cheap guns and ammo out there, or there will be anarchy!I never said that so please quit lumping me in with the foil hat crowd.
December 28, 201114 yr I never said that so please quit lumping me in with the foil hat crowd. Well, you did say that further legislation would make it too expensive for the "average" American.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.