November 23, 201015 yr Author Clinton naver avoided being asked a question, but he avoided giving truthful answers. Well done.
November 23, 201015 yr Seems like he did one or two with O'Reilly. That's what I was thinking, and I believe it was after he had the nomination. So it really won't hurt her to avoid tough questions. Actually, in her case it's probably best.
November 23, 201015 yr Author That's what I was thinking, and I believe it was after he had the nomination. So it really won't hurt her to avoid tough questions. Actually, in her case it's probably best. I agree for the most part. However, should she land the R nomination I'm not sure if going on Fox or "friendly" media will be enough to get to those that she needs in order to swing the election her way.
November 23, 201015 yr I agree for the most part. However, should she land the R nomination I'm not sure if going on Fox or "friendly" media will be enough to get to those that she needs in order to swing the election her way. I agree, I just meant in the run up to the nomination. If nominated she would have to interview everywhere. That will be bad for her but good for everyone else.
November 23, 201015 yr That's what I was thinking, and I believe it was after he had the nomination. So it really won't hurt her to avoid tough questions. Actually, in her case it's probably best. I think it's hyperbolic to suggest that only O'Reilly asks tough questions or that Democrats are only asked tough questions by O'Reilly, whichever you're inferring. At any rate, during a competitive primary every candidate is going to get pressed and scrutinized very heavily, and even if they were to somehow avoid any difficult questions they would still be forced to respond to attacks from their opponents and run through the gauntlet of televised debates. I don't believe Palin could survive that. Her only hope, in my estimation, is that her core group of supporters band together no matter what happens and the rest of the candidates split the votes amongst themselves. How would Palin respond to tough Republican questioning, especially from, say, conservative wonks looking for specifics? How would Palin look arguing against someone like Mitch Daniels on national television? Could she successfully play the victim against Mike Huckabee? I think it would ruin her.
November 23, 201015 yr Obama was on O'Reilly & I thought both of them did pretty well. Palin would be ignorant to run for President in 2012. She has a 51% unfavorable rating, and the only move that percentage will make is more toward the unfavorable side. Hard to imagine her winning over very many more people. Refusing to be interviewed by Couric doesn't help her cause IMO.
November 23, 201015 yr IF she runs and IF she gets the nomination this country has officially lost it's mind.
November 23, 201015 yr I think it's hyperbolic to suggest that only O'Reilly asks tough questions or that Democrats are only asked tough questions by O'Reilly, whichever you're inferring. At any rate, during a competitive primary every candidate is going to get pressed and scrutinized very heavily, and even if they were to somehow avoid any difficult questions they would still be forced to respond to attacks from their opponents and run through the gauntlet of televised debates. I don't believe Palin could survive that. Her only hope, in my estimation, is that her core group of supporters band together no matter what happens and the rest of the candidates split the votes amongst themselves. How would Palin respond to tough Republican questioning, especially from, say, conservative wonks looking for specifics? How would Palin look arguing against someone like Mitch Daniels on national television? Could she successfully play the victim against Mike Huckabee? I think it would ruin her. I thought he was just inferring it would be best for her not to do the interview because she would mishandle it, regardless of the level of scrutiny. You deciphered a lot more than I did. :lol:
November 23, 201015 yr Obama was on O'Reilly & I thought both of them did pretty well. Palin would be ignorant to run for President in 2012. She has a 51% unfavorable rating, and the only move that percentage will make is more toward the unfavorable side. Hard to imagine her winning over very many more people. Refusing to be interviewed by Couric doesn't help her cause IMO. That has been my rationale all along. I know people like to poke at Palin, and much of it is deserved; however, I do not feel she is as dumb as many portray her to be or for that fact as dumb as she portrays herself. For surely she knows her place amongst the electorate. As I alluded to a few weeks ago, someone like Palin jumping in begs for a 3rd party candidate to take the Presidency. Obama is polarizing and has a base that will not be swayed. She is polarizing and with a base not to be swayed. There are a lot of Americans looking for an alternative.
November 23, 201015 yr As I alluded to a few weeks ago, someone like Palin jumping in begs for a 3rd party candidate to take the Presidency. Obama is polarizing and has a base that will not be swayed. She is polarizing and with a base not to be swayed. There are a lot of Americans looking for an alternative. Ding, ding, ding! This country is RIPE for a good third party candidate. I don't think Palin is that candidate, but there are quite a few out there who would be. I truthfully never thought I'd see a third party Pres in my lifetime, but I'm beginning to think again.
November 23, 201015 yr Palin is unelectable. I have a very hard time believing there are even enough R's so disenchanted that she could get the nomination. If she somehow were to win the nomination, Obama will absolutely get term 2.
November 23, 201015 yr Ding, ding, ding! This country is RIPE for a good third party candidate. I don't think Palin is that candidate, but there are quite a few out there who would be. I truthfully never thought I'd see a third party Pres in my lifetime, but I'm beginning to think again. I've been begging for a viable 3rd party for the last 3 elections. I guess I've been ahead of the curve :lol: but I have suffered greatly in making my decisions in the presidential election since Clinton left office. I am not a right winger (no surprise there. :lol:), and I have chosen to whole-heartedly support Obama this go-around. But honestly, had a 3rd choice been available I may have gone in that direction, provided it wasn't a Rand Paul-type candidate.
November 23, 201015 yr I think it's hyperbolic to suggest that only O'Reilly asks tough questions or that Democrats are only asked tough questions by O'Reilly, whichever you're inferring. At any rate, during a competitive primary every candidate is going to get pressed and scrutinized very heavily, and even if they were to somehow avoid any difficult questions they would still be forced to respond to attacks from their opponents and run through the gauntlet of televised debates. I don't believe Palin could survive that. Her only hope, in my estimation, is that her core group of supporters band together no matter what happens and the rest of the candidates split the votes amongst themselves. How would Palin respond to tough Republican questioning, especially from, say, conservative wonks looking for specifics? How would Palin look arguing against someone like Mitch Daniels on national television? Could she successfully play the victim against Mike Huckabee? I think it would ruin her. Obama was fed softballs other than O'Reilly and he really didn't hammer him either. Look it up.
November 23, 201015 yr I thought he was just inferring it would be best for her not to do the interview because she would mishandle it, regardless of the level of scrutiny. You deciphered a lot more than I did. :lol: That too.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.