The only two teams that I think are for sure better are UC and Pitt. After that, I see no reason why UK couldn't beat the likes of USF, UCONN, Rutgers, etc.

 

 

WVU and USF?

WVU and USF?

 

 

I think UK could beat WVU. WVU did lose big to Auburn.

WVU and USF?

 

I listed USF and the post above me shows they could play with WVU.

I watch every game... how many do you watch?

I have watched almost every single snap..keep in mind, I hate UK, therefore I have to make sure I am informed in my criticism.

:ohbrother:

 

You and I both know that the only reason you use terms like 'terrible' and 'a garbage team' is to get a rise out of UK fans. UK is right now a bottom rung, middle of the pack SEC team. In another conference, they are MUCH higher. But they aren't. They are an average team in the toughest football conference in the country. But I still love em.

 

They could be average in another BCS conference, but they aren't in another BCS conference. They are bottom feeders in the SEC....there is no way around that argument.

The only two teams that I think are for sure better are UC and Pitt. After that, I see no reason why UK couldn't beat the likes of USF, UCONN, Rutgers, etc.

 

I don't think they are better than WVU or USF..that would make them 5th in the Big East....awesome.

I am a state of Kentucky football fan. I pull for UK and every team that plays against UofL. With that being said, UK's program is not exactly wallowing... UofL is stuck in the mud and will be for a long time to come.

 

I would rather be where UK is now, in a very strong conference, attending bowl games vs. UofL staying home for the holidays in a wallowing conference!

 

This trend for Louisville will turn around sooner than you would like. UK is mired in a rut of finishing in the bottom of their conference, the route out is easier for U of L and will be rectified soon.

I don't think they are better than WVU or USF..that would make them 5th in the Big East....awesome.

 

If the bowl projections hold true, we could get to see either a UK vs WVU or UK vs USF matchup.

 

Nobody said the Cats were 'awesome'. But they aren't 'garbage' either.

I have watched almost every single snap..keep in mind, I hate UK, therefore I have to make sure I am informed in my criticism.

Consider the source who has expressed his disdain for UK in general.

 

He is stirring the pot guys!

 

It does not merit a reply.

 

I am a UK guy who does not hate U of L. I actually root for them nearly eleven times each season. I especially root for some of their players and coaches I know.

 

It is not painful for me to take the high road and give them a fair shake. Try it......you might like it.

I don't think they are better than WVU or USF..that would make them 5th in the Big East....awesome.

 

You don't think.

 

Auburn had no trouble with WVU... we had no trouble with Auburn. Does that mean we are better? Nah. Somehow you can conclude both of those teams are better than us though... :lol: good stuff keep it coming.

I have watched almost every single snap..keep in mind, I hate UK, therefore I have to make sure I am informed in my criticism.

 

Unlike Jim Schue, your hatred for UK controls your life? I love it!!!

This trend for Louisville will turn around sooner than you would like. UK is mired in a rut of finishing in the bottom of their conference, the route out is easier for U of L and will be rectified soon.

 

As long as Pitno stays in Louisville your route out of your wallow will be a burdensome task. It is for most basketball schools.

 

The only difference is that Uk can manage both...

You don't think.

 

Auburn had no trouble with WVU... we had no trouble with Auburn. Does that mean we are better? Nah. Somehow you can conclude both of those teams are better than us though... :lol: good stuff keep it coming.

 

UK had no trouble with Auburn? It was a very tight game....and UK had zero TO's and zero penalties.....how often does that happen.

As long as Pitno stays in Louisville your route out of your wallow will be a burdensome task. It is for most basketball schools.

 

The only difference is that Uk can manage both...

I don't understand your first post, as I am not a Louisville basketball fan....in regards to your second....if you're happy with 6-6 and 7-5 every year, and being in the bottom of the SEC, then I guess you can say "manage"....

UK had no trouble with Auburn? It was a very tight game....and UK had zero TO's and zero penalties.....how often does that happen.

 

Maybe I misinterpreted your post, but it seems to me like zero turnovers & zero penalties is a finely played football game & something that should be complimented.

 

Am I wrong?