stick1 Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 No suprise it was just on the crawler that he tested positive in 03.
The Scribe Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 Wow. What's next? Pete Rose gambled on baseball? Wilt Chamberlain slept around? Michael Irvin did cocaine?
bigblueinsanity Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 :deadhorse: We have known this all along.
DragonFire Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 So that's bye bye HOF for him. Probably already wasn't getting it.
stick1 Posted February 4, 2009 Author Posted February 4, 2009 Its good to see the proof, IMO. I agree. There was no doubt but now it's not speculation.
MJAlltheWay24 Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 If he tested postive in 2003, why did it take six years to prove it?
racer4life Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 If he tested postive in 2003, why did it take six years to prove it? It is crazy that it took 6 years to prove it.
racer4life Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 Tests positive for what? And who is Bonds? :laugh::laugh:
JPP Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 What bothers me most about Bonds is not his denial of using. It was that when questioned he said something to the likes of yes plenty are using, they are just cheating to try and keep up with me. It made me want to :puke:!
Recommended Posts