June 18, 200818 yr Well excuse me, Dad. I just wanted to know why he singled Kobe out, which is why I asked. Like I said, its easy to hate the best... Deuce, I'm not your father.
June 18, 200818 yr Not really...only one team gets that title of "Champions". Boston is the Champs this year. Everyone else lost...they are losers. Including the Spurs. And its better to actually have had the opportunity to be the champs than watch it from home... :sleep:
June 18, 200818 yr Not really...only one team gets that title of "Champions". Boston is the Champs this year. Everyone else lost...they are losers. Including the Spurs. I could care less either way but the Lakers still get to say that they're the best in the Western conference and that's something the Spurs can't do.
June 18, 200818 yr And its better to actually have had the opportunity to be the champs than watch it from home... :sleep: Um...losing is still losing. It doesn't matter if it's the first round or in the finals. That's how I see it anyways.
June 18, 200818 yr Well gentlemen, I'd love to celebrate all night but unfortunately I have to be up for work in 5 hours...
June 18, 200818 yr Not really...only one team gets that title of "Champions". Boston is the Champs this year. Everyone else lost...they are losers. Including the Spurs. Right, but it sure felt great to beat those Spurs and their arrogant fans. That is something I got out of being "first losers". Are you saying there is no difference in losing in the NBA finals and missing the playoffs?
June 18, 200818 yr I could care less either way but the Lakers still get to say that they're the best in the Western conference and that's something the Spurs can't do. :thumb: You know HB would have a different tune had the Spurs lost in the NBA Finals.
June 18, 200818 yr :thumb: You know HB would have a different tune had the Spurs lost in the NBA Finals. No, I wouldn't. But this thread is not about the Spurs is it?
June 18, 200818 yr I could care less either way but the Lakers still get to say that they're the best in the Western conference and that's something the Spurs can't do. I know that. I understand that the Spurs did not make it. I'm trying to not talk about the Spurs here. I'm talking about the Lakers getting beat in the finals.
June 18, 200818 yr Are you saying there is no difference in losing in the NBA finals and missing the playoffs? :lol: :lol: :thumb:
June 18, 200818 yr Right, but it sure felt great to beat those Spurs and their arrogant fans. That is something I got out of being "first losers". Are you saying there is no difference in losing in the NBA finals and missing the playoffs? I'm glad you got that feeling. I'm truly happy for you. I'm saying a loser is a loser. The Lakers got a "Western Conference Championship". If the Lakers and their fans are happy with that, then that is good.
June 18, 200818 yr No, I wouldn't. But this thread is not about the Spurs is it? Then why did you bring them in it???
June 18, 200818 yr Right, but it sure felt great to beat those Spurs and their arrogant fans. That is something I got out of being "first losers". Are you saying there is no difference in losing in the NBA finals and missing the playoffs? I never said that at all. I'm saying that while the Lakers have a Western Conference Championship, they're still just the top loser of the group.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.