March 14, 200818 yr Sam Young might be the most underrated player in the country. Big, strong, can score and defend. He drove me nuts this year... :thumb: Pitt is no pushover...they're always a good defensive team it seems. Disappointing for U of L, no doubt, but not the end of the world.
March 14, 200818 yr Man that game made my head hurt. Got to hate the games where you couldn't hit water even if you fell out of a boat!! :irked::irked:
March 14, 200818 yr I LOVE IT!!! I hope their one and done in the NCAA as well. Assuming you make this comment because you are a UK fan....I suggest you worry about your own team!!
March 14, 200818 yr Assuming you makes this comment because you are a UK fan....I suggest you worry about your own team!! :thumb:
March 14, 200818 yr Pitt is not the better team. UL is still a #4 seed. UofL played an absolute stinker tonight, which I hope they get out of their system. I hope your right! This makes two in a row that they have just absolutly just didn't paly basketball.
March 14, 200818 yr Assuming you make this comment because you are a UK fan....I suggest you worry about your own team!! :thumb::thumb::thumb::thumb: :fight::fight::fight: :ylsuper::ylsuper::ylsuper:
March 14, 200818 yr Please. UK is not in Pitt's league. Don't go there. It is too late for me to laugh. Let me run this down for you one more time. UofL demolished UK (in January) at Rupp Arena. The week before UK beat Vandy. UK had their ENTIRE roster. UofL did not have Earl Clark. It was not a game. Yes, UK has got better since then. So has UofL. I would argue UofL has improved more than UK since that game (so would most experts). I would love to see UK in the first round. Meeks was not 100%. He won't be until full 2 months of rest in the off season.
March 14, 200818 yr Meeks was not 100%. He won't be until full 2 months of rest in the off season. For that case neither was Jasper, Padgett, Tello etc.
March 14, 200818 yr Still, you look for a silver lining and bad as the Cards played, it still took OT for Pitt to win. The one constant the last two games has been the poor execution of Jerry Smith and T-Will's absence. We've got to get those two more focused. Cards guards are KILLING them. There is no threat from the outside and they are shooting like some of us. T Will needs to re think some things too. Sometimes T-Will will make you think he has figured it out, then he will do some goofy stuff. Two consecutive possessions in OT he made terrible decisions. I've been saying that about the Cards all year. When T-Will doesn't worry about getting his shots they are a much better team. UL's record when T-Will takes 10 or more shots, 13-8. UL's record when T-Will takes fewer than 10 shots, 11-0. This is not a coincidence.
March 14, 200818 yr You still want UK in the first round of the NCAA? Everyday, and twice on Sundays.....UK can't matchup with U of L, that's right, can't.
March 14, 200818 yr I agree with a lot of things already stated... UofL played TERRIBLE, but STILL got the game into overtime. I don't know if I'd say my Cardinals are actually a better team than Pitt, at least talent-wise, but when they play don't as tired and careless as they did this game and put some heart into it then they beat Pitt. Also, due to previous, seemingly random NCAA seedings of the Cardinals, I see them as getting a 6 seed, though deserving a 5 or maybe 4 depending on other teams losing. ...and let's not be too hasty, people... UofL is still better than UK this year.
March 14, 200818 yr I've been saying that about the Cards all year. When T-Will doesn't worry about getting his shots they are a much better team. UL's record when T-Will takes 10 or more shots, 13-8. UL's record when T-Will takes fewer than 10 shots, 11-0. This is not a coincidence. A nice observation. Of course, T-Will takes more shots when Smith and McGee can't hit the broad side of a barn, which has been happening a lot recently.
March 14, 200818 yr I agree with a lot of things already stated... UofL played TERRIBLE, but STILL got the game into overtime. I don't know if I'd say my Cardinals are actually a better team than Pitt, at least talent-wise, but when they play don't as tired and careless as they did this game and put some heart into it then they beat Pitt. Also, due to previous, seemingly random NCAA seedings of the Cardinals, I see them as getting a 6 seed, though deserving a 5 or maybe 4 depending on other teams losing. ...and let's not be too hasty, people... UofL is still better than UK this year. A six or five seed is totally out of line. UofL has a RPI of 12, SOS of five, finished down the stretch 9-3, finished second in the Big East etc. I know people think they get hosed by the NCAA, but this is the best resume they have ever had since RP got there. That 05 resume was better as far as wins and losses, but it was agaisnt a bunch of chumps. All expert media outlets still have UofL at a 3 seed, even though I think they will slip to a four. Nothing less than a four, I am pretty sure of that.
March 14, 200818 yr A six or five seed is totally out of line. UofL has a RPI of 12, SOS of five, finished down the stretch 9-3, finished second in the Big East etc. I know people think they get hosed by the NCAA, but this is the best resume they have ever had since RP got there. That 05 resume was better as far as wins and losses, but it was agaisnt a bunch of chumps. All expert media outlets still have UofL at a 3 seed, even though I think they will slip to a four. Nothing less than a four, I am pretty sure of that. I do hope you're right.
March 15, 200818 yr I do hope you're right. To comfort you more.... Vandy, Xavier, Uconn, Notre Dame and Purdue all lost. I don't see anyway the Cards don't get a three now. These were the teams they were competing with. The top four or the last three seed. That is how I see it now.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.