Jump to content

Ripken's 2632 vs. Favre's 275


More impressive  

47 members have voted

  1. 1. More impressive

    • Ripken
      19
    • Favre
      28


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Favre's because of two things -- the constant wear and tear on a quarterback compared to a shortstop and the fact that if Favre played the way Ripken did the last two years of his MLB streak, he would have been riding the bench in the NFL

Posted
Cal. One game a week for 16 weeks compared to a 162 game schedule.

 

But it is baseball!!! Farve has the bigger accomplishment!

 

How many years does each of their streaks extend for?

Posted
Favre's because of two things -- the constant wear and tear on a quarterback compared to a shortstop and the fact that if Favre played the way Ripken did the last two years of his MLB streak, he would have been riding the bench in the NFL

And I can never remember Favre just going out for one play then sitting on the bench to continue his streak.

Posted
Cal. One game a week for 16 weeks compared to a 162 game schedule.

 

That one game a weak is much more brutal than any of those 162 games ever thought about being.

 

It's easy, it's Favre.

Posted
That one game a weak is much more brutal than any of those 162 games ever thought about being.

 

It's easy, it's Favre.

 

I'm not so sold on that, 162 games in a 180 days is pretty brutal..

Posted
Look, I get it. Quarterbacks take a lot of punishment. But come on, 162 games a season for 10+ years? It's Cal.

 

Its Favre. 17 seasons of getting hit and drilled by defensives, and never missing a game is amazing. Not to mention you talk about the 162 games a year Cal had to play. But you don't take into account all the practices, and film sessions during the week an NFL QB would have to go through, and the mental and emotional toll that would take on someone for 17 years.

 

Both streaks are amazing, however I would take Favre's.

Posted
I'm not so sold on that, 162 games in a 180 days is pretty brutal..

 

It's not as brutal as what Favre went through. Football is a painful sport, and Favre played through a ton of bad injuries.

 

Ripken, like some already mentioned, would play just to keep his streak going, then sit on the bench.

 

Once again, it's an easy choice for Favre.

Posted
Its Favre. 17 seasons of getting hit and drilled by defensives, and never missing a game is amazing. Not to mention you talk about the 162 games a year Cal had to play. But you don't take into account all the practices, and film sessions during the week an NFL QB would have to go through, and the mental and emotional toll that would take on someone for 17 years.

 

Both streaks are amazing, however I would take Favre's.

 

Baseball players don't practice or scout the other team?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...