October 24, 200718 yr I'm not sure the economics are right here. Wages may rise in some sectors that absolutely have to have low skilled workers, but what we would really see is a cutback in jobs, slower growth, and most probably higher prices. That certainly wouldn't eliminate poverty. Not sure I follow that. If a construction company can pay workers $6.00 per hour and get several and then that option is no longer available to them, you are saying they will just not build as many houses instead of hiring Americans at $10 per hour? While I understand that the number of homes will be lower, I don't think they go back to zero and not hire workers to replace what they need. I do agree that the economy will drop slightly because of the lower cost of wages, but do think you would see a rise in the standard of living in those that are actively seeking a job and wanting to work but that are not willing to work at $6 per hour with no benefits as the illegal immigrants are.
October 24, 200718 yr I think what we will see is less profit going into the pockets of those employers willing to hire illegals.
October 24, 200718 yr "Enforce the laws we have now" is easier said than done. Enforcing the laws we have now requires resources that have not been allocated . Our country lacks adequate numbers of border patrol agents, border fencing/wall, border surveillance infrastructure, more effective legal mechanisms and systems to police employer compliance, and on and on. Getting appropriations for such resources requires Congressional actions. Good luck getting things through Congress if you're not willing to compromise.If your basement is flooded, you repair the leak before you waste time shopping for a new pump. Passing an amnesty bill without having adequate border security and enforcement of our current laws would have been a recipe for disaster. "Amnesty bill" was a much more accurate description of the legislation that our elected representatives tried to sneak through Congress than "guest worker program" was. Congress and the President wrongly assumed that the American people were too ignorant to notice the misnamed bill before it could become law. Enforcing current law does not mean that every single illegal alien has to be rounded up immediately and sent back home. We can start with those who are apprehended committing additional crimes. The roundup costs for those felons would be minimal, but it does no good to deport when we cannot make the deporation permanent. I think that an amnesty program will have widespread support if the federal government first cuts off the flood of illegals. We need the labor of immigrants and they need the jobs, but let's get them off on the right foot by providing some strong incentives to stop breaking our laws.
October 24, 200718 yr See post #1. You have your choice of how to spend the money that we save. But you don't save that money right away. You have to invest the extra money to stop the problem and then recoup that a year or years after.
October 24, 200718 yr Sit around and wait for the next civil war. They are bringing what 500k a year over here. Their army is building.
October 25, 200718 yr Sit around and wait for the next civil war. They are bringing what 500k a year over here. Their army is building. :confused: I'm confused SA. Who are "they" and where is "over here," and whose army is building?
October 25, 200718 yr :confused: I'm confused SA. Who are "they" and where is "over here," and whose army is building? I think he's referring to the Mexicans.
October 25, 200718 yr I think he's referring to the Mexicans. I wondered. Because he does understand that all illegals aren't Mexican, right? I was also curious how it's a Civil War if it's a foreign army (his inference) and the US army? Sorry if I sound punchy but I get a lot of email crap from church members who send anything along. A lot of it is racist based junk with little facts and no one seems to want to talk about the real dollars and real efforts we are speaking of in dealing with the problem.
October 25, 200718 yr I wondered. Because he does understand that all illegals aren't Mexican, right? I was also curious how it's a Civil War if it's a foreign army (his inference) and the US army? Sorry if I sound punchy but I get a lot of email crap from church members who send anything along. A lot of it is racist based junk with little facts and no one seems to want to talk about the real dollars and real efforts we are speaking of in dealing with the problem. I get the same thing, Hatz.
October 25, 200718 yr I think there is a legitimate concern that many Mexicans both in the US and Mexico would like to see the southwest returned to Mexico. Especially California.
October 25, 200718 yr Why so much hatred for "Mexicans"?? They are making $0.50 at best an hour with marginal health care, resources, facilities, etc. Wouldnt you steal to feed your starving family?? Why not go to another country illegally to save them?? The problem in my opinion is the lack of stability in Mexico. If things were better there, these people wouldnt need to leave (or would be less frequent). Isn't the riches man in the world from Mexico?? I wonder what that "gringo" is worth?
October 25, 200718 yr I think there is a legitimate concern that many Mexicans both in the US and Mexico would like to see the southwest returned to Mexico. Especially California. Three words for you: REMEMBER THE ALAMO!!!!!!!!
October 25, 200718 yr Why so much hatred for "Mexicans"?? They are making $0.50 at best an hour with marginal health care, resources, facilities, etc. Wouldnt you steal to feed your starving family?? Why not go to another country illegally to save them?? The problem in my opinion is the lack of stability in Mexico. If things were better there, these people wouldnt need to leave (or would be less frequent). Isn't the riches man in the world from Mexico?? I wonder what that "gringo" is worth? I don't recall seeing anyone say they hated Mexicans.
October 25, 200718 yr The problem in my opinion is the lack of stability in Mexico. If things were better there, these people wouldnt need to leave (or would be less frequent). Isn't the riches man in the world from Mexico?? I wonder what that "gringo" is worth? Carlos Slim Helu worth $67.8 billion. Made his fortune in telecommunications. His fortune is equivalent to 8% of Mexico's GDP.
October 25, 200718 yr Carlos Slim Helu worth $67.8 billion. Made his fortune in telecommunications. His fortune is equivalent to 8% of Mexico's GDP. Not meant to be a slam but I thought 67.8 billion would be more than 8% of Mexico's GDP.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.