T-CAT4LIFE Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 Then in the post I was questioning, there shouldn't have been any rankings used at all...He failed to recognize that a couple of the teams UConn and Duke lost to were ranked, yet made sure that all three teams UK lost to had their rankings noted...Hmm...:sssh: Im not saying you were wrong.. Just that you can't really guage teams by comparing rankings, period. Much less from the beginning of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDeuce Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 Im not saying you were wrong.. Just that you can't really guage teams by comparing rankings, period. Much less from the beginning of the season. And I understand what you're saying...But for the sake of the arguement, rankings need to either be completely used, or not used at all. :thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEERFAN Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 I think they should be in the polls, still vulnerable but improving and should be able to win every conference game before the UT game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mobaar Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 Then in the post I was questioning, there shouldn't have been any rankings used at all...He failed to recognize that a couple of the teams UConn and Duke lost to were ranked, yet made sure that all three teams UK lost to had their rankings noted...Hmm...:sssh: I was going by current rankings, and forgot about LSU. That was my mistake I always prefer to use rankings from a single week to do comparisons. Regardless though, UConn's and Duke's losses have undoubtedly been to worse teams than UK's losses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diggerphelps Posted January 12, 2007 Author Share Posted January 12, 2007 Possibly, but how far down is UK's SOS going to go playing against the best conference in the nation? Nothing GT? :confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gametime Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 Nothing GT? :confused: Sorry must have missed that one. Their SOS will remain strong, no doubt. I was talking about the lofty RPI ranking. He said the system wasn't designed to be on point right now, and that's what I was pointing out... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wireman Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 I think they should be in the polls, still vulnerable but improving and should be able to win every conference game before the UT game. I think that UK is better than UT, as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEERFAN Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 I agree Wireman but that should be a challenging game, they should win the others no questions asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nomorenoles Posted January 13, 2007 Share Posted January 13, 2007 15 to 35 right now are all about the same. Cats fall in there some where. They are getting better and the players seem to finally paying attention to Tubby. If Bradley and Crawford continue to do what Tubby asked of them this could be a team that makes a nice run. Keep winning and the rankings will take care of themselves. Coach Calhoun do you have anything else you want to say? Your Huskies may not be as good as you thought they were. Now I know why the coaching fraternity dispices you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts