August 4, 20188 yr Author Because they’re 2 different burdens of proof. I’m not sure why that’s so difficult for you and JA to understand. Here we go with burden of proof again. What exactly burden of proof is Urban required to follow again?
August 4, 20188 yr Also, don’t stand for DV, you are in possession of screenshots, do what’s right. If you have exculpatory evidence, come forward, do what’s right. #saveurban
August 4, 20188 yr Here we go with burden of proof again. What exactly burden of proof is Urban required to follow again? Notice how they are ducking the Saban thread... that says a lot to me about what they think about DV.
August 4, 20188 yr If you have exculpatory evidence, come forward, do what’s right. #saveurban There is nothing to present. He followed the terms of his contract.
August 4, 20188 yr Here we go with burden of proof again. What exactly burden of proof is Urban required to follow again? If you haven’t figured it out yet, I’m not sure what else I can do for you. You guys are basing what Urban’s actions should’ve been on the fact the guy wasn’t prosecuted. He doesn’t need to beyond a reasonable doubt to can the guy. If you can’t figure out the difference between civil and criminal at this point, that’s on you my friend.
August 4, 20188 yr There is nothing to present. He followed the terms of his contract. Hmmm. Is he still on leave?
August 4, 20188 yr Notice how they are ducking the Saban thread... that says a lot to me about what they think about DV. No ones ducking anything. It has nothing to do with this :lol2: keep deflecting though :lol2:
August 4, 20188 yr If you haven’t figured it out yet, I’m not sure what else I can do for you. You guys are basing what Urban’s actions should’ve been on the fact the guy wasn’t prosecuted. He doesn’t need to beyond a reasonable doubt to can the guy. If you can’t figure out the difference between civil and criminal at this point, that’s on you my friend. He also doesn’t have to fire a guy who was never charged. So you fire coworkers who are accused of allegations, regardless if their proven or not?
August 4, 20188 yr Urban did what he was required to do, report it to his boss. Two sides to every story and the OSU haters don’t like the other side of the story. All I know are the facts...he was never charged with anything, sorry. There’s always 3 sides to the story.
August 4, 20188 yr He also doesn’t have to fire a guy who was never charged. So you fire coworkers who are accused of allegations, regardless if their proven or not? It’s not a criminal trial to have grounds to fire someone. The guy covered for him. If that’s who you want running your team, that’s on you :thumb:
August 4, 20188 yr Hmmm. Is he still on leave? Paid leave, yes. And that’s the right thing to do by the University. They have to gather all of the facts and more came out today.
August 4, 20188 yr Author Notice how they are ducking the Saban thread... that says a lot to me about what they think about DV. Oh but we are just deflectors, don’t you remember?
August 4, 20188 yr It’s not a criminal trial to have grounds to fire someone. The guy covered for him. If that’s who you want running your team, that’s on you :thumb: You still refusing to answer my questions?
August 4, 20188 yr Author If you haven’t figured it out yet, I’m not sure what else I can do for you. You guys are basing what Urban’s actions should’ve been on the fact the guy wasn’t prosecuted. He doesn’t need to beyond a reasonable doubt to can the guy. If you can’t figure out the difference between civil and criminal at this point, that’s on you my friend. The burden of proof in 2015 was that there was none.
August 4, 20188 yr Oh but we are just deflectors, don’t you remember? If it’s OSU.. fire them immediately. If it’s another school, avoid the thread.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.