October 2, 200620 yr So DD you already have it as a full blown affair and sexual misconduct. With what's been released so far that's quite a leap even by your standards. Foley's IM and e-mails are disgusting. He definitely should have resigned and IF IT IS FOUND that he engaged in criminal activity he should be prosecuted. Just like Clinton should have been for committing perjury. Also based on this post you probably shouldn't endeavor to correct another poster's spelling. Sorry about the spelling but PEDOPHILE is not part of my everyday vocabulary. And the difference in the two politicans you mentioned is: ONE OF THEM WILL HAVE TO REGISTER AS A SEX OFFENDER
October 2, 200620 yr I assume that you have not seen the transcripts of some of these emails or you would not try to defend this pedofile. Foley knows he's quility or he would not have stepped down so quickly. If the shoe was on the other foot do you want us to believe that you would not make it an issue as well. I am sure you never had any comments on Clinton's affair. Big diference in an affair and sexual misconduct with a young boy. My point is we expect the "blame the Dems" angle when all you hear from the leaders of your party when they disagree is "cut and run" or "appeasers" or "on the side of terrorist". I've been fuming about this all day. How dare you accuse me of defending a pedophile. You don't know me and if you did, you would know better. You've made a bad, bad mistake in this thread.
October 2, 200620 yr I've been fuming about this all day. How dare you accuse me of defending a pedophile. You don't know me and if you did, you would know better. You've made a bad, bad mistake in this thread. Read my first line. " I ASSUME YOU HAVE NOT READ...."
October 2, 200620 yr I would think that it is reasonable to believe that both parties were well aware of Foley's indiscretions. The Republicans hoped to keep it quiet at least until after the election., The Democrats held it until an opportune time for strictly political purposes. The sad fact is that neither party cares one iota about the page/pages. Both merely play the politics. Of course, the same can be said about all of our issues from the war to social security to abortion to whatever else you wish to mention. Apparently they did NOT include the democratic senators involved in the Page Program and everything was brought to light thru internet searches by ABC investigative reporters last Friday.
October 2, 200620 yr Apparently they did NOT include the democratic senators involved in the Page Program and everything was brought to light thru internet searches by ABC investigative reporters last Friday. Both Democrats and Republicans are claiming they were unaware of the instant messages until last week. Also, does ABC have the ability to check everyone's Instant messages or just Congressmen and their pages? Last time I checked they're not one of the government organizations that possess supena power. Instead of worrying about Dubya listening to phone calls to Al Queda, perhaps we should be worrying about what instant messages ABC might broadcast on the evening news.
October 3, 200620 yr Sorry about the spelling but PEDOPHILE is not part of my everyday vocabulary. And the difference in the two politicans you mentioned is: ONE OF THEM WILL HAVE TO REGISTER AS A SEX OFFENDER Please provide a link showing that based on what is now known Foley will have to register as a sex offender. Again I think it's another DD stretch to assumption. Who was the other politician that I referenced?
October 3, 200620 yr Please provide a link showing that based on what is now known Foley will have to register as a sex offender. Again I think it's another DD stretch to assumption. Who was the other POLOTICIAN that I referenced? Simply a prediction. You will have to go back to varify, but I think the other politician you mentioned was Clinton.
October 3, 200620 yr actions are the demorats fault One description I can agree with DD on. And you are correct I did mention Clinton as in Clinton is a liar and should have been charged with purgery.
October 3, 200620 yr One description I can agree with DD on. And you are correct I did mention Clinton as in Clinton is a liar and should have been charged with purgery. That we can all verify
October 3, 200620 yr One description I can agree with DD on. And you are correct I did mention Clinton as in Clinton is a liar and should have been charged with purgery. HAHAHA....taken out of contex but i would not expect an admission. As far as LIES and CURRENT EVENTS. I think those accusations are flying toward your party of choice from the top down.
October 3, 200620 yr HAHAHA....taken out of contex but i would not expect an admission. As far as LIES and CURRENT EVENTS. I think those accusations are flying toward your party of choice from the top down. What was I supposed to admit to? I said I called Clinton a liar. What else were you talking about? I'm not fluent in evasion so I may need some translation. You're the one that called then demorats. That's what I agreed with you about.
October 3, 200620 yr What was I supposed to admit to? I said I called Clinton a liar. What else were you talking about? I'm not fluent in evasion so I may need some translation. You're the one that called then demorats. That's what I agreed with you about. I am sure your a nice guy AT, but I sure hope we never agree on anything political.
October 3, 200620 yr I cannot believe that Hastert's response when asked if he knew about this in any conversations last year, "I don't remember!" WHAT? He doesn't remember if someone cam to him and mentioned that Foley has sent these emails to a 16 year old page? COME ON! EITHER YES OR NO! The ball was in his court, and it looks like he did nothing, for political reasons. This is one time I will applaud Geoff Davis for doing the right thing, for once, he gave back all money he received from Foley. It's a no brainer. There is no way to spin this, anyone who is in office or running for office needs to condemn this, and not back him up or say it's JUST inappropriate emails, if not vote them out, and for those who knew about it and did nothing, they need to go as well! Hastert losses his job over this!
October 3, 200620 yr I hope you are also targeting any democrats who may have known about this and held onto the information for political purposes. I think everyone who knew about this and kept it quiet should lose their jobs at the minimum.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.