September 29, 200620 yr Arizona no question. Cincy in a real close second. They have 2 superstars at each side Fitzgerald & Boldin and a good receiver in Bryant Johnson. That trumps Cincy's 1 Superstar and 2 good receivers.
September 29, 200620 yr Overall I'd take Cincy's depth, Henry would be a starter on 25 other teams in the league, you can't really say that about Bryant Johnson, Cards #3.
September 30, 200620 yr I'd have to say cinci indi arizona The question was about the corps as a whole and every one of the bengals recievers can play with the best of them. Indi has 4 upper tier recievers if you include the tight end. Arizona has two of the best recievers in the league, but after them there isn't much to them. So if you include everyone it'd have to be the bengals
September 30, 200620 yr 1+2's I'll take Boldin/Fitzgerald and Harrison/Wayne then 85+T.J. If healthy Owens/Glenn is a pretty good one too! If you are looking at a 3 WR or 4 WR set then I'd take the Bengals.
September 30, 200620 yr 1+2's I'll take Boldin/Fitzgerald and Harrison/Wayne then 85+T.J. If healthy Owens/Glenn is a pretty good one too! If you are looking at a 3 WR or 4 WR set then I'd take the Bengals. Exactly:thumb:
September 30, 200620 yr I think the world of the Cards' group but you have to factor their numbers are a bit skewed since they had absolutely no running game.
September 30, 200620 yr Minus the deep ball. Leinart could be very dangerous with the timing routes and such, but he can't stretch the field like Carson... Agreed, not sure any can.
September 30, 200620 yr Arizona no question. Cincy in a real close second. They have 2 superstars at each side Fitzgerald & Boldin and a good receiver in Bryant Johnson. That trumps Cincy's 1 Superstar and 2 good receivers. Fitzgeralds a Superstar. He may be talented but I don't think he's put up nearly the type of #'s as CJ,Moss,Harrison, or T.O. Also I think Henry is likely better than Fitzgerald.
October 2, 200619 yr Fitzgeralds a Superstar. He may be talented but I don't think he's put up nearly the type of #'s as CJ,Moss,Harrison, or T.O. Also I think Henry is likely better than Fitzgerald. I'm sorry, but I believe you forgot to put a winking smiley after that comment. No way is Chris Henry even close to Fitzgerald:laugh:
October 2, 200619 yr I would think that Indy has the best group out there with Cincy #2, and Arizona #3.
October 3, 200619 yr 2005 stats Fitzgerald 1409 rec yds 10 Td's 2006 316 yds 1 TD Johnson 2006 201 yds 1 TD 1432 rec yds 9Td's Owens hurt in 05 7 games 2006 187 yds 1TD in 04 1200 rec yds 14 TD's Harrison 2006 413 yds 0TD 1146 rec yds 12 TD's Moss assuming you meant randy 2006 84 yds 1 TD 1008 rec yds 8 TD's Fitzgeralds been in the league for 3 years now. It looks like to me that he will succeed in passing a few of these guys. So for you to say he's not putting up the numbers comparable to these guys is ludicrous or ill informed on your part.
October 3, 200619 yr I think the Rams are up there pretty high, not in top 2, but up there. Did someome say that Chris Henry is better than Fitzgerald??? That is a joke right? :laugh:
October 3, 200619 yr I think the Rams are up there pretty high, not in top 2, but up there. Did someome say that Chris Henry is better than Fitzgerald??? That is a joke right? :laugh: ^^^Better at Cops and Robbers.
October 3, 200619 yr I'll take the Colts over the Bengals any day of the week. Better QB, better WR's all around IMO. Not to mention they do a good job of staying out of jail too!
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.