Well, what chaos is going to happen at Inauguration by Democrats?

[jericho]

Mt. ref ... Did you read the story you linked?

 

Yeah

Said Obama fired him and the General said timing was unusual.

 

I guess Trump just accepted the resignation.

[Voice of Reason]

Yeah

Said Obama fired him and the General said timing was unusual.

 

I guess Trump just accepted the resignation.

 

Hopeless.

 

Fake news has nothing when compared to mountain ref news.

[Clyde]

Yeah

Said Obama fired him and the General said timing was unusual.

 

I guess Trump just accepted the resignation.

 

Trump-esque

[Clyde]

Are we sure Breitbart favorite son James O'Keefe didn't pay these people to stage these protests?

 

 

 

He wouldn't do that. Would he?

 

 

Counter-Sting Catches James O'Keefe Network Attempting To Sow Chaos At Trump's Inauguration | The Huffington Post

 

Maybe CNN or Buzzfeed or MSNBC or HuffPost or WaPo or NYT set this up. I'm sure it's not real.

[jericho]

Are we sure Breitbart favorite son James O'Keefe didn't pay these people to stage these protests?

 

 

 

He wouldn't do that. Would he?

 

 

Counter-Sting Catches James O'Keefe Network Attempting To Sow Chaos At Trump's Inauguration | The Huffington Post

 

Maybe CNN or Buzzfeed or MSNBC or HuffPost or WaPo or NYT set this up. I'm sure it's not real.

 

Kind of like the Democrats getting caught paying people to cause problems at the Trump rally's.

[Sportsaholic Mamaw]

I do not find this "chaos" amusing, ironic, satirical or whatever. I do find it dangerous for protestors, rioters, blockades, anarchists, agitators,tourists, government workers, law enforcement officers, elected officials and dangerous for our country and government set up by the framers of the Constitution.

[THE SHERIFF]

Protesters better be cautious, when it comes to the security of the president these guys won't play games.

[Watchmen]

They have designated areas for their protests which are far from the president elects locations during the inauguration. Anyone outside those areas that pose any potential threat will be dealt with immediately. They will not interfere with anyone voicing protests but if you are in a undesignsted area you will be dealt with

 

Pretty much what has been shared by secret service. Bottom line, if you watch tv you should not see a thing unless the news wants to fabricate a story

 

Curious to see how media wants to portray. They tried to make a big thing out of the RNC but it actually was pretty mild. The DNC had by far the worst protests between the two groups (sanders / Clinton). Thus why you had the security walls go up over night

[Voice of Reason]

If there are protestors there in large quantity, it is a story that should get some mention. If the media ignores it, that would be shameful. I don't want the media to conceal news from me. I want to know what is going on.

[JC Alumni 76]

If there are protestors there in large quantity, it is a story that should get some mention. If the media ignores it, that would be shameful. I don't want the media to conceal news from me. I want to know what is going on.

 

You will know what they think you should and want you to know. They don't even attempt to hide it anymore.

[Voice of Reason]

As flawed as the media is, it is one of the most important institutions in our nation and at the very core of a free democracy. Freedom of the press is included in the First Amendment to the Constitution.

[Clyde]

Kind of like the Democrats getting caught paying people to cause problems at the Trump rally's.

 

 

EXACTLY like that. So I assume you take this as a personal affront.

[Voice of Reason]

Kind of like the Democrats getting caught paying people to cause problems at the Trump rally's.

 

EXACTLY like that. So I assume you take this as a personal afront.

 

Thank you Clyde.

 

I constantly see posts like that one by mt.ref which seem to argue that there is no problem with Trump or Republicans doing something because Obama and/or Dems did it. That is a terrible argument to make. The poster hated it when Obama and/or Dems did it. But it is ok for Trump/R's to do it because Obama/D's did it? If you hated/opposed something when Obama/D's did it, then you should hate it when Trump/R's do it. That is one of the worst arguments someone can make and it happens in thread after thread after thread.

[capt278]

Thank you Clyde.

 

I constantly see posts like that one by mt.ref which seem to argue that there is no problem with Trump or Republicans doing something because Obama and/or Dems did it. That is a terrible argument to make. The poster hated it when Obama and/or Dems did it. But it is ok for Trump/R's to do it because Obama/D's did it? If you hated/opposed something when Obama/D's did it, then you should hate it when Trump/R's do it. That is one of the worst arguments someone can make and it happens in thread after thread after thread.

 

It should go both ways for you guys too. If you were OK with Obama and the Dems doing something, you should be OK with Trump and the Repubs doing it.

[Clyde]

It should go both ways for you guys too. If you were OK with Obama and the Dems doing something, you should be OK with Trump and the Repubs doing it.

 

Who was ever "OK" with any group paying people to protest?

 

I'm not OK with people killing kittens. Do I need to post that?