Jump to content

Survivor: Game Changers

formerkywrestler
 Share

Recommended Posts

GrantNKY

GrantNKY

Posted
Posted
I might be in the minority, but I don't really care for Michaela much at all.

I think they are editing her way different than they did last season. Last season they made her out to be the more responsible one in the group of millenials. This season they are making her out to be more childish. I don't know, maybe she is acting different this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 556
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

Voice of Reason

Voice of Reason

Posted
Posted
Varner was too afraid of the repercussions of going against Sandra in that vote. Would've rather seen Michaela go home, but he made the right decision. Only wanna make an enemy of Sandra if her torch is getting snuffed.

 

Very sly. Completely took any talk or focus off her and put the focus/target on JT and Michaela.

 

And by the way, I love Michaela. One of my favorite players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MJAlltheWay24

MJAlltheWay24

Posted
Posted
Question about JT... he was terrible this season. Where does his play this season rank among bad player seasons? What other players who made it through multiple episodes had a worse season than what JT did this year?

 

I'm not sure the answer to your question, but man he was bad. Makes you wonder how he won in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Voice of Reason

Voice of Reason

Posted
Posted

I wonder if some of the players think if Sandra makes it to the final 3 there is no way she would get votes because she has won it two times? I hope not. If I was on the jury and she was in the final 3 she would be an automatic winner and get my vote no matter what kind of game anybody else played. If she could get to the final 3 as a two-time winner they should just give her the title and not even have a vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
All Tell

All Tell

Posted
Posted
I wonder if some of the players think if Sandra makes it to the final 3 there is no way she would get votes because she has won it two times? I hope not. If I was on the jury and she was in the final 3 she would be an automatic winner and get my vote no matter what kind of game anybody else played. If she could get to the final 3 as a two-time winner they should just give her the title and not even have a vote.

 

I was thinking exactly the same thing. Back in week 1 she was talking about there being no chance for her (or JT or Tony) to win again because the jury wouldn't vote for her. She's already planting those seeds among the potential jurors so she can talk herself up at final tribal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MJAlltheWay24

MJAlltheWay24

Posted
Posted
I wonder if some of the players think if Sandra makes it to the final 3 there is no way she would get votes because she has won it two times? I hope not. If I was on the jury and she was in the final 3 she would be an automatic winner and get my vote no matter what kind of game anybody else played. If she could get to the final 3 as a two-time winner they should just give her the title and not even have a vote.

 

I think I am with you VOR. She would certainly have a compelling argument to get my vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
formerkywrestler

formerkywrestler

Posted
  • Author
Posted
It's unimaginable to me that they allow Sandra to hang around in anyway. She has won twice for a reason, she PLAYS the game and is always playing the game. Everyone seems too comfortable going along with her, they are stupid! :lol2:

 

It's amazing. She has orchestrated eliminating the only other two winners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.

  I accept