May 31, 201610 yr You are comparing apples n oranges . And NO , a thousand times NO , Trump didnt win by pulling in a bunch of extra R voters , he won by pulling in people who usually are not involved in politics and dont always vote . So pretty much how President Obama got elected.
May 31, 201610 yr You are comparing apples n oranges . And NO , a thousand times NO , Trump didnt win by pulling in a bunch of extra R voters , he won by pulling in people who usually are not involved in politics and dont always vote . The larger question is how many Republicans will vote for Mrs. Clinton if she is NOT indicted. More than a few million would be my guess.
May 31, 201610 yr Author So pretty much how President Obama got elected. Yes , his version of Uncle Sam becoming Santa Claus drew in a handful of new people .
May 31, 201610 yr The larger question is how many Republicans will vote for Mrs. Clinton if she is NOT indicted. More than a few million would be my guess. I think you are dreaming if you think millions of Republicans are going to vote for Hillary. They may stay home and not vote. I doubt that 10 to 15 percent, which is what a few million of the actual voters would be, will vote for her.
May 31, 201610 yr I think you are dreaming if you think millions of Republicans are going to vote for Hillary. They may stay home and not vote. I doubt that 10 to 15 percent, which is what a few million of the actual voters would be, will vote for her. As we move closer to election day, Trump's negatives will really start to weigh on the American electorate. People of every political persuasion will ask themselves: "Do we really want this guy to have his finger on the button of our nuclear arsenal?"
May 31, 201610 yr As we move closer to election day, Trump's negatives will really start to weigh on the American electorate. People of every political persuasion will ask themselves: "Do we really want this guy to have his finger on the button of our nuclear arsenal?" For all of the teeth gnashing and crazy rhetoric from the left Trump is no more apt to "Push the Button" than any other President has been.
May 31, 201610 yr For all of the teeth gnashing and crazy rhetoric from the left Trump is no more apt to "Push the Button" than any other President has been. True. But he's more apt to drive someone else to push the button.
May 31, 201610 yr I must have missed where it said everyone polled was a Democrat... I'll have to agree with you there. Many Republicans like me who would still want her to run. An already weak candidate made more vulnerable sounds perfect to me.
May 31, 201610 yr As we move closer to election day, Trump's negatives will really start to weigh on the American electorate. People of every political persuasion will ask themselves: "Do we really want this guy to have his finger on the button of our nuclear arsenal?" Better question is why would I want some to push the button who is under investigation for compromising national security .
May 31, 201610 yr She will never be indicted. She knows too much on people In charge and has some very deeeeeeeeeeewp pockets.
May 31, 201610 yr If she isn't indicted the people should go full scale French Revolution and bring guillotine back out and come see me with a starter list. Yes Hillary is first on list.
May 31, 201610 yr You are comparing apples n oranges . And NO , a thousand times NO , Trump didnt win by pulling in a bunch of extra R voters , he won by pulling in people who usually are not involved in politics and dont always vote . So let me get this straight, you start off by saying Republicans would be smart enough not to vote for someone like Hilary like Democrats have. Then you turn around and use excuses for how Trump won the Republican nomination? So now you say it is only because of people who usually don't vote that Trump is the candidate. It seems to me if these republicans that you claim are smarter would have came out and made sure Trump didn't win then. So are you saying these smarter people were just to lazy to get out and vote then to make sure Trump didn't win? I mean its not like it just happened over night, republicans got to see for months Trump slowly winning more and more states, and yet these smarter republicans as you say were just to lazy to get out to vote to stop it? Does that sound smart? What about the last two Republican candidates against Trump finally agreeing to work together to stop Trump, and then an hour later Kazich tells his supporters to still vote for him even though he just agreed to back down in that state? That sure doesn't seem like a very smart move by a said Republican either. It's especially more funny that Trump ended up winning rather easily. While on the Democrats side, if it wasn't for the Super Delegates Bernie Sanders honestly may have beaten Clinton based off of the people's votes. So sounds like the Democrat voters are not as dumb as you want to believe. The Democrat process of super delegates is though. Quite honestly I am sick of both parties and have been saying it for months. I just find it funny when someone tries to claim that one party is smarter than the other people's party. Especially when their party just nominated Trump as their candidate.
June 1, 201610 yr Republicans for Hillary? - CNNPolitics.com Seems she is carrying some Republicans. There will be more Dems vote for Trump than Republicans vote for Hillary. Wait and see....
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.