September 22, 201511 yr Hold on. I'm writing that one down.:clap: I think it actually goes. If you don't stand for something you'll fall for anything.
September 22, 201511 yr I think it actually goes. If you don't stand for something you'll fall for anything. Well that explains your many positions very succinctly .
September 22, 201511 yr I assume you're familiar with Google, are you not? You want to know the answer, you can do the work... I have no idea if they did nor do I care. They have the right to get the marriage certificate even if they don't use it. Man you guys are brutal today
September 22, 201511 yr Well that explains your many positions very succinctly . I'm consistent, whether I be right or wrong in people's eyes. Very rarely do I waiver.
September 22, 201511 yr Man you guys are brutal today Takes two of them to deal with me. And this was on one of my nice politically correct posts. :laugh:
September 22, 201511 yr I actually asked a simple question with no other intentions that to know the answer. You can say that you were wondering if some people got the license with no intentions of getting married just to push an agenda. It's a valid question. It is also irrelevant since it is a right that belongs to two consenting adults, but I agree anything could have happened during the circus with the rally and protesters. Of course, maybe none of the couples actually got married since Davis got out of jail and changed the paperwork.
September 22, 201511 yr You can say that you were wondering if some people got the license with no intentions of getting married just to push an agenda. It's a valid question. It is also irrelevant since it is a right that belongs to two consenting adults, but I agree anything could have happened during the circus with the rally and protesters. Of course, maybe none of the couples actually got married since Davis got out of jail and changed the paperwork. You must not have read alot of my posts. The posts you would call a "agenda" are very easy to spot. :thumb: But this was not one of them.
September 22, 201511 yr You must not have read alot of my posts. The posts you would call a "agenda" are very easy to spot. :thumb: But this was not one of them. I have read quite a few of your posts. I think we have a misunderstanding. My fault on my phrasing, but I wasn't referring to you pushing an agenda, but actually the hypothetical couple who would attempt to obtain a license with no intentions of going through with a marriage. Sorry about the confusion.
September 22, 201511 yr Well I can see where the posters could have a thought I was alluding to that. Really I was not. But I will say if they have not got married yet they are pushing an agenda and if they did this then then are, well I better not say that. But we are all good.:thumb:
September 22, 201511 yr "On Friday, Mason's attorney told the judge that when Davis returned to work Monday she "confiscated all the original forms" and replaced them with forms that delete her name, the name of the county and all references to the deputy clerks. The new form has Mason's name and a place for him to write his initials but not his signature. "It also appears to this counsel those changes were made in some attempt to circumvent the court's orders and may have raised to the level of interference against the court's orders," attorney Richard Hughes wrote. "Mr. Mason is concerned because he is in a difficult position that he continues to issue the licenses per the court's order ... which had some remote questionable validity, but now with these changes may in fact have some substantial questions about validity." mountain ref didn't get it the first time you posted it, perhaps he will the 2nd time, but don't hold your breath. If it doesn't support an over inflated sense of self-importance of demonstrating his soothsaying prowess by contributing only a selective portion of the situation through his impaired vision then he's not likely to recognize what your post is getting at and how it makes his points feeble and invalid, thereby exposing the fallacy of his personal flaccid agenda.
September 22, 201511 yr Is there a time limit after you get the license? Just a guess, maybe there is no time limit? We all know that planning a wedding can take up to several months though.
September 22, 201511 yr Is there a time limit after you get the license? Just a guess, maybe there is no time limit? We all know that planning a wedding can take up to several months though. 30 Days. Just looked it up.
September 22, 201511 yr If you don't stand for something you fall for everything. Thanks Mr. Mellencamp.
September 23, 201511 yr 30 Days. Just looked it up. [ATTACH=CONFIG]52416[/ATTACH] Thank you. So when people get married they get this license just before the wedding. Now I know
September 23, 201511 yr The gay marriage license that was issued the first day she was back was on 9/14/15.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.