Joker, you cannot compare teams based on one game each. You are comparing Arizona's worst game against UK's most likely best game. How about if you saw AZ beat Oregon and compared that game against UK's butt whipping against Georgia?? Your take would be totally different. AZ is 7-2 and ranked #14 in the country by the Committee for a reason...

 

I'm not calling UK's game against LSU one of their best games. Saturday Night in Death Valley is where records go to die.

 

I probably caught 'Zona on a bad night, but I watched that game in person and saw bits of the Oregon one. Only being 3 points better than a team who is 1-4 in Conference USA and 2-7 overall just left an awful taste in my mouth.

 

 

Agree that I'm probably putting too much emphasis on one game, but I'm still thinking of Arizona like I usually do Missouri-- paper tiger.

Alabama's gonna get beat at Auburn. Anybody wanna think more about my scenario?

Alabama's gonna get beat at Auburn. Anybody wanna think more about my scenario?

 

Did Auburn end up losing to UGA?

Bama did beat MSU as your scenario set out.

Did Auburn end up losing to UGA?

Bama did beat MSU as your scenario set out.

 

Final:

 

Georgia 34

Auburn 7

Alabama's gonna get beat at Auburn. Anybody wanna think more about my scenario?

 

Auburn doesn't look remotely like a team that could win in Tuscaloosa.

Alabama's gonna get beat at Auburn. Anybody wanna think more about my scenario?

 

Zero chance.

Alabama's gonna get beat at Auburn. Anybody wanna think more about my scenario?

 

 

Not this year...

8. What is the air-speed velocity of an unladen swallow?

 

:lol2:

Any national championship playoff without an SEC team in it is invalid, and that will be the situation every year.

The committee won't penalize the strongest conference in the nation for beating up on one another.

Any national championship playoff without an SEC team in it is invalid, and that will be the situation every year.

The committee won't penalize the strongest conference in the nation for beating up on one another.

 

Perhaps, but how will the committee justify taking a two-loss SEC champ over a whole slew of one-loss teams? You still have to win the games in front of you.

Perhaps, but how will the committee justify taking a two-loss SEC champ over a whole slew of one-loss teams? You still have to win the games in front of you.

Ohio St, Baylor, TCU and Oregon are the only 1 loss Top 25 teams left...A 2 loss SEC Champ would have to get in over them, if they were to get in.

 

0-loss

Noles

 

1-loss

Bama

Bulldogs

Ducks

Bucks

Frogs

Bears

Perhaps, but how will the committee justify taking a two-loss SEC champ over a whole slew of one-loss teams? You still have to win the games in front of you.

 

 

That's why I think the rankings should be taken out of the committee's hands and use the old BCS computer system. I believe you would come closer to getting the best 4 teams that way regardless of records. It takes most of the human bias out of the equation.

Here is an interesting question...being the last unbeaten, could/should FSU still make the final four if they suffer a loss from here on out? They have BC and Florida plus Conf Championship Game left.

Here is an interesting question...being the last unbeaten, could/should FSU still make the final four if they suffer a loss from here on out? They have BC and Florida plus Conf Championship Game left.

 

No. If FSU loses, they're out.

No. If FSU loses, they're out.

 

Should they be considering who the loss would be to? Either BC, Gators or Duke/Ga Tech