Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

The Bengals, most talented blah blah blah.

Featured Replies

  • Author
Which is exactly why you got the response that you got from me, since you also added in the whole Bengals most talented my arse. Referencing something we had many discussions about. Which its probably a good thing you didn't get to see the 4 straight turnovers, because I even admit it was pathetic to see. However we have to learn that this really isn't the same old Bengals teams, old Bengal teams would have never been able to overcome such mistakes.

True, and I will add one thing also that I am hoping shows this game the turning point the bengals have needed for many many years. Marvin actually made good use of the red flag for once. I think maybe Hell froze over today lol

  • Replies 151
  • Views 14.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
True, and I will add one thing also that I am hoping shows this game the turning point the bengals have needed for many many years. Marvin actually made good use of the red flag for once. I think maybe Hell froze over today lol

 

Yes great point!!! For once Marvin actually used his challenges perfectly, and if he didn't it would have cost them the game.

 

By the way I know I said I thought the Bengals made all the right decisions this off season, well I take that back now. I do think they made a mistake keeping Nugent over Josh Brown. Nugent is good at making kicks when doesn't seem to be to much pressure. However over the last few years, I have seen him miss to many very important kicks. Not talking about just at the end of games either. Field goals from right before half that he has missed, to field goals in the 4th that could cut a lead down or expand a lead. Then today he missed again. I know it was a 52 yarder, however he has always stuggled from long distance. I do think they missed up keeping him over Brown.

Yes great point!!! For once Marvin actually used his challenges perfectly, and if he didn't it would have cost them the game.

 

By the way I know I said I thought the Bengals made all the right decisions this off season, well I take that back now. I do think they made a mistake keeping Nugent over Josh Brown. Nugent is good at making kicks when doesn't seem to be to much pressure. However over the last few years, I have seen him miss to many very important kicks. Not talking about just at the end of games either. Field goals from right before half that he has missed, to field goals in the 4th that could cut a lead down or expand a lead. Then today he missed again. I know it was a 52 yarder, however he has always stuggled from long distance. I do think they missed up keeping him over Brown.

 

I agree with the Brown vs. Nugent. Brown made big kicks (one real big one in a place that is the hardest to kick), Nugent usually doesn't.

  • Author

Why would the most talented team need to sign Crocker? Hmmmm

Why would the most talented team need to sign Crocker? Hmmmm

 

You wonder why people say everything you say is always negative mostly. You can't let go of the most talented thing, even though people with no bias at all even say it. Shoot if you watched any pregame show this past sunday, and then even during the game with the announcers, and then after they talked about all the talent the Bengals have everywhere. Your 2005 team they never said that, all it was in 2005 was that the Bengals had a talented and explosive offense, not team. Move on man your making your self look really bad with this.

 

As for Crocker its pretty simple 4 of their 6 defensive backs are hurt, and one of them just got arrested again. Crocker does make the most sense to fill in for now because he can come right in because he knows the defense. Its no more no less man. Move on from it.

You wonder why people say everything you say is always negative mostly. You can't let go of the most talented thing, even though people with no bias at all even say it. Shoot if you watched any pregame show this past sunday, and then even during the game with the announcers, and then after they talked about all the talent the Bengals have everywhere. Your 2005 team they never said that, all it was in 2005 was that the Bengals had a talented and explosive offense, not team. Move on man your making your self look really bad with this.

 

As for Crocker its pretty simple 4 of their 6 defensive backs are hurt, and one of them just got arrested again. Crocker does make the most sense to fill in for now because he can come right in because he knows the defense. Its no more no less man. Move on from it.

 

He's the only one that wonders that.

  • Author
You wonder why people say everything you say is always negative mostly. You can't let go of the most talented thing, even though people with no bias at all even say it. Shoot if you watched any pregame show this past sunday, and then even during the game with the announcers, and then after they talked about all the talent the Bengals have everywhere. Your 2005 team they never said that, all it was in 2005 was that the Bengals had a talented and explosive offense, not team. Move on man your making your self look really bad with this.

 

As for Crocker its pretty simple 4 of their 6 defensive backs are hurt, and one of them just got arrested again. Crocker does make the most sense to fill in for now because he can come right in because he knows the defense. Its no more no less man. Move on from it.

 

To help you out FC, this thread is about the most talented team and is why I posted that comment in this thread.

To help you out FC, this thread is about the most talented team and is why I posted that comment in this thread.

 

Yeah just like every chance you get in any thread you bring up the talent. Just like you jumped the gun in the middle of the Packers game saying most talented team my arse. When they showed they must be pretty darn talented to be able to overcome 4 turnovers to still beat one of the top teams in the NFL. I know you first hated the comment since I was probably one of the first people you heard say it, and you thought it was just me looking through my orange shaded glasses. But come on man majority of people even see it these days, and people with no bias in the situation. Yes its hard for you to get behind a franchise who has let you down so much, and so its hard to believe that they actually assembled such a talented team. Which is fine if you feel that way, I probably would too after all those years. However just making yourself look bad with these whole bashing the talent comments. Yes you felt the 2005 team had a better chance to make a run, and that is fine I can even buy that. However overall talent it was not close, and overall talent includes depth to man and not just starters. So move on past it and let it go and be happy that we do have that talent. Lets just hope now our QB can step his play up, and the coaching doesn't screw things up in games.

  • Author
Yeah just like every chance you get in any thread you bring up the talent. Just like you jumped the gun in the middle of the Packers game saying most talented team my arse. When they showed they must be pretty darn talented to be able to overcome 4 turnovers to still beat one of the top teams in the NFL. I know you first hated the comment since I was probably one of the first people you heard say it, and you thought it was just me looking through my orange shaded glasses. But come on man majority of people even see it these days, and people with no bias in the situation. Yes its hard for you to get behind a franchise who has let you down so much, and so its hard to believe that they actually assembled such a talented team. Which is fine if you feel that way, I probably would too after all those years. However just making yourself look bad with these whole bashing the talent comments. Yes you felt the 2005 team had a better chance to make a run, and that is fine I can even buy that. However overall talent it was not close, and overall talent includes depth to man and not just starters. So move on past it and let it go and be happy that we do have that talent. Lets just hope now our QB can step his play up, and the coaching doesn't screw things up in games.

 

You keep talking about depth when talking about talent. Sorry FC that you can't see that the 2005 team was better, that is your problem not mine. But when you keep talking about depth and that is why I made the comment about Crocker becaue going off of your definition of talent being depth then why should the Bengals have to sign a re-tread that no one else wants and has been released by this team twice already and not picked up by anyone else. The most talented (deep team in the NFL) shouldn't have to sign a bum like that after only the 3rd week of the season.

You keep talking about depth when talking about talent. Sorry FC that you can't see that the 2005 team was better, that is your problem not mine. But when you keep talking about depth and that is why I made the comment about Crocker becaue going off of your definition of talent being depth then why should the Bengals have to sign a re-tread that no one else wants and has been released by this team twice already and not picked up by anyone else. The most talented (deep team in the NFL) shouldn't have to sign a bum like that after only the 3rd week of the season.

 

There you go again just like when we first started last December with your made up stuff. Last December your big thing was that you kept saying that I said the Bengals were great and going to win Super Bowl, blah, blah blah. Which I proved to you countless times that I never said that, but that was your big thing to say since you had nothing else.

 

Now your big thing avoid what started it all. Which is I said this was the most talented team since the 80's. So your response has been and apparently still is that the 2005 team was better. Which I am still waiting to see where I came out and said that this years team had a better chance to make a run. Shoot I have even had post saying how I definitely can agree that the 2005 team was set up to make a run with an explosive offense, and an opptunistic defense who wasn't a good defense but could create turnovers. Which is a good set up to make a deep run in the playoffs. Then you liked to point out just starters from the 2005 team, and nothing else. You continually jump back to the 2005 team was better and off what started it all. What I have said from the very beginning and what is TRUE is this years team is more talented and the key word being TEAM. I know that is hard for you to admit and wrap your head around the idea that you argued something from the beginning that had no need to be argued. Just because a team is more talented doesn't mean it is set up to make a better run. We know what the team in 2005 did and that team was set up to make a deep run and proved it throughout the season. This years team still has that question mark at QB, which is why I have always said that this years success depends on Dalton. If he doesn't make the next step then the talent around him doesn't matter. I mean seriously you have made yourself look really bad on this, because your arguing something for no dang reason. This years TEAM TEAM TEAM TEAM TEAM is definitely more talented because a team does include backups. Doesn't mean it is set up to make a deeper run that what the 2005 team was because we seen that 2005 team was ready by how they played the whole year. This year still has to be played, but talent it is not question that this years team has more talent and people see that. Move on man.

 

Which by the way even their backups are hurt in Dre and Gee to go along with Hall and Adam Jones are are hurt. That is why they had to add him back. Its not like one guy went down and they needed to add him. So even the depth is hurt right now, its no more no less.

  • Author

You continually dance around the issue. I said the 2005 team was better and yet you still avoid that fact like the plague.

 

Just say it, say the 2005 team was better. I didn't say anything about the 2005 team was set up to make a better run, you said I said that which is another lie from you.

 

This team which you have said is not only the most talented bu deepest still signed a scrub like Crocker. If they were everything you said they wouldn't of needed to sign Crocker.

 

So do yourself a favor and admit you were wrong about the 2005 team.

  • Author

And FC Hall said he will play so apparently it was only 1 guy hurt and they went and signed Crocker lol.

You continually dance around the issue. I said the 2005 team was better and yet you still avoid that fact like the plague.

 

Just say it, say the 2005 team was better. I didn't say anything about the 2005 team was set up to make a better run, you said I said that which is another lie from you.

 

This team which you have said is not only the most talented bu deepest still signed a scrub like Crocker. If they were everything you said they wouldn't of needed to sign Crocker.

 

So do yourself a favor and admit you were wrong about the 2005 team.

 

You really don't get it do you man? You just really don't. I said this was the most talented team since the 80's. Please show me where I said this team is definitely better? I have a feeling I will be waiting awhile. You took a comment of me saying this years team is the most talented and decided to twist and turn in it so you can try to find a way to disagree. You have now made an argument on which team is better, and where did this discussion even start? Oh yeah that same imaginary place you made last year when you kept claiming I said the Bengals were great, but yet you could never show me where I said it. Same case here, nice try again man. The 2005 team was a really good team and I will say the 2005 team was better because we know how that year went. I have never said otherwise, you have argued this for a month now FOR NO REASON AT ALL. However this years team is more talented, but QB play does really dictate how a team does. Palmer was one of the best in football that year, Dalton is still a question mark. That is why I will admit the 2005 team was better, it was not more talented. That is what you for some reason can't get through your head, and argued something that there was nothing to argue and I have tried and still trying to get you to comprehend that.

And FC Hall said he will play so apparently it was only 1 guy hurt and they went and signed Crocker lol.

 

Wow man, just wow. I remember you telling me once before to do some research before I say things, and well I have constantly gave you much more research while you just throw things out. I guess you didn't know Dre Kirkpatrick has been out with a pulled hamstring, Ghee has been out with a concussion, Taylor Mays basically is the 6th linebacker now and practicing there so thats another DB gone. Adam Jones was hurt going into last week and has another off field incident to worry about. Hall does have a strained hamstring and even you must know that a hamstring injury is one that is hard to go away and can get worst quickly. Nelson this week has been out with an unknown ailment. So yes even teams with a lot of depth do have to go out and sign someone when they have that many injuries going on. I know that is hard for you to comprehend because you have put forth such a great fight for the last month, even though I just pointed out for no reason. However now your to the point where is useless with you because people with no bias at all like you have for all the bad years can see how deep and talented this team is. Now will that talent translate into bigger things we will see, and as we both agree on it will come down to Dalton and coaches now messing it up.

  • Author
Wow man, just wow. I remember you telling me once before to do some research before I say things, and well I have constantly gave you much more research while you just throw things out. I guess you didn't know Dre Kirkpatrick has been out with a pulled hamstring, Ghee has been out with a concussion, Taylor Mays basically is the 6th linebacker now and practicing there so thats another DB gone. Adam Jones was hurt going into last week and has another off field incident to worry about. Hall does have a strained hamstring and even you must know that a hamstring injury is one that is hard to go away and can get worst quickly. Nelson this week has been out with an unknown ailment. So yes even teams with a lot of depth do have to go out and sign someone when they have that many injuries going on. I know that is hard for you to comprehend because you have put forth such a great fight for the last month, even though I just pointed out for no reason. However now your to the point where is useless with you because people with no bias at all like you have for all the bad years can see how deep and talented this team is. Now will that talent translate into bigger things we will see, and as we both agree on it will come down to Dalton and coaches now messing it up.

 

Wow man just Wow....for a team that is the deepest in the league according to you they sure had to go and sign some scrubs just after the 3rd game of the year.......Again, you still talk about how deep this team is, yet you can't admit that maybe you were wrong. So now you are saying because they had to move a safety to LB they had to sign another safety...lol, how deep of a team is that when they have to move a safety to LB because they don't have the depth at LB and now go out and sign a scrub safety to take the place. lol. Classic, you will never own up to your shortfallings will you?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.