She's on my people you may know thing on facebook. She and her boytoy look so cute.

 

Yes I Facebook stalked.

BGP does it.

 

They attempt to review all posts after they are made, right? How long are before every post is reviewed. Yes there are some forums/sites that do require a post to be reviewed prior to it being posted, but as far as I know, not many.

 

They attempt to review all posts after they are made, right? How long are before every post is reviewed. Yes there are some forums/sites that do require a post to be reviewed prior to it being posted, but as far as I know, not many.

 

We do our best to review as much as possible. We do have to sleep sometimes, though. And work. And family stuff...and then there's football.

 

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Forum Runner

And I will add everyone, if you see something that is violation of our terms of service there is a report a bad post feature attached to every post on the site and you are strongly encouraged to use it.

 

We don't want false information on the site but there is a big difference between posting blatantly false information and giving an unpopular opinion.

 

Finally, and many of you may not know this, but individual users, and not BGP, are responsible for what they post.

They attempt to review all posts after they are made, right? How long are before every post is reviewed. Yes there are some forums/sites that do require a post to be reviewed prior to it being posted, but as far as I know, not many.

 

Maybe when he's spent enough on lawyers he'll try it. The problem is that his website not only doesn't hold people accountable, it appears to encourage cyber bullying. That's where his responsibility is greater than other websites where something might get put up for a while.

Evidently young Ms Jones violated her probation and is in trouble again - now she must pay to wear and ankle monitoring device! Deters of course disagrees.

 

Court: Former teacher and ex-BenGal cheerleader, Sarah Jones, violated probation

I can't help but think she is being a singled out a little.

I can't help but think she is being a singled out a little.

 

Agreed. If what Deters is saying is true, I don't see how it could be seen as a parole violation. He's her employer, and sent her there during the work day. Seems legit to me. :idunno:

If she hadn't gone looking for sex with a teenager, no one would give a crap what side of the river she's on. As it stands, she brought all this on herself. I have no sympathy for her.

^I think you're confusing "teenager" for "student"....

If I'm the judge in this case I'd do the same thing. Her and her boss are trying to make a mockery of this case. As someone mentioned she refuses to go away quietly.

Ok, I think some should step back and take their opinion of her and the trial to the side for a second.

 

The facts are: She was allowed to leave the state to go to school, UC, and if she needed to go for work. She did in fact go to work. She was within the probation guidelines. If she was working, why did Kenton Co say she violated her parole? As clearly she did not.

Along the lines with what Guru said, I think she and Deters are being singled out as the Kenton Co prosecutors office is upset at Deters, and are looking to "get him". And BTW, I dislike Deters! But facts are facts.

If I'm the judge in this case I'd do the same thing. Her and her boss are trying to make a mockery of this case. As someone mentioned she refuses to go away quietly.

 

She is paying her debt to society and even if they are "trying to make a mockery of the case" prosecutors, judges, police officers, probation officers, etc. are not supposed to be vindictive.

Was she working when she went to WLW or was she there to be interviewed for her lawsuit which would not be related to her work? I have no idea; that's why I ask.