December 17, 201213 yr No, it shouldn't. We aren't England. PepRock explained that rater well in another thread, look it up. Like hell it's apple and oranges. Black market. Need I say more? You think criminals buy their guns legally? Once again, if a reason is because we have more guns why is fixing that not worthy of consideration? You, yourself said our abundance of guns is a reason these types of incidents happen more here than elsewhere. I'm not naive enough to think you can get rid of all guns. I realize there will be a black market. I'm neither a gun nor an anti-gun expert but I'm certain I've seen studies where banning them has helped elsewhere. I can't shoot a person with a joint. Apples and oranges...
December 17, 201213 yr The POTUS said what many Americans of all political leanings are saying: We can do better and owe it to kids everywhere to at least talk about this , debate it, and SEE if there is a better way. If that means that some weapons are outlawed so be it. The Constitution does not come without responsibilities. I have Freedom of Speech but can't yell "FIRE" in a theater. Seems like we can all agree that all weapons are not covered under the Constitution. I'd hope we also talk about mental health. If some of you cats want to call dialogue and debate "politicization" go right ahead. The debate needs to happen and NOW is the time to have the discussion. Well said. All I'm really asking is why a debate can't happen? The EXTREME gun folks here don't seem to think its worthy of a debate EVEN when they admit our abundance of guns is a reason...
December 17, 201213 yr Author Well said. All I'm really asking is why a debate can't happen? The EXTREME gun folks here don't seem to think its worthy of a debate EVEN when they admit our abundance of guns is a reason... Lock up crazy people....that is a start.
December 17, 201213 yr Lock up crazy people....that is a start. Lock them up for what? What would we have locked this kid up for?
December 17, 201213 yr The President can't win in this situation. If he tells the parents he wants to do more to protect kids, it's seen as politicizing. If he doesn't mention it and gets emotional, he comes off as soft. I haven't voted for the President the past two elections, but there is no way I am going to criticize him for the past week. As he did with Sandy, he came off as Presidential and showed leadership. Republicans will bash, Democrats will praise. Lather, rinse, repeat. I thought it was unwise of him to say what he said in the speech. I think he could have just been mourner-in-chief tonight & then tomorrow given a speech that frames the debate. Having said that, because this situation is so difficult & challenging, I certainly cannot hold it against the President.
December 17, 201213 yr Author Lock them up for what? What would we have locked this kid up for? For being crazy? Almost EVERY single nut job that has done this in these situations have had warning signs that parents ignored or did not treat. Multiple reports of the mother knowing the kid had issues but "handled him" on her own.
December 17, 201213 yr For being crazy? Almost EVERY single nut job that has done this in these situations have had warning signs that parents ignored or did not treat. Multiple reports of the mother knowing the kid had issues but "handled him" on her own. Again, what did this kid do that would warrant putting him away? My 20-yr-old has "issues." What the hell does that mean?
December 17, 201213 yr The POTUS said what many Americans of all political leanings are saying: We can do better and owe it to kids everywhere to at least talk about this , debate it, and SEE if there is a better way. If that means that some weapons are outlawed so be it. The Constitution does not come without responsibilities. I have Freedom of Speech but can't yell "FIRE" in a theater. Seems like we can all agree that all weapons are not covered under the Constitution. I'd hope we also talk about mental health. If some of you cats want to call dialogue and debate "politicization" go right ahead. The debate needs to happen and NOW is the time to have the discussion. Wrong. I don't know that I like it, but I fully believe the constitutional framers meant for us to be allowed to own any firearm we wanted. Whether they could envision the guns we have now or not may be a different story.
December 17, 201213 yr Wrong. I don't know that I like it, but I fully believe the constitutional framers meant for us to be allowed to own any firearm we wanted. Whether they could envision the guns we have now or not may be a different story. Believe what you want. "Arms" were not defined.
December 17, 201213 yr I don't think Thomas Jefferson envisioned a rifle that shoots hundreds of rounds a minute killing small children when he helped craft that amendment. There'e been amendments repealed in the past so let's not act like they got it all right in 1776.
December 17, 201213 yr I don't think Thomas Jefferson envisioned a rifle that shoots hundreds of rounds a minute killing small children when he helped craft that amendment. There'e been amendments repealed in the past so let's not act like they got it all right in 1776. And when government agencies are the only ones left with weapons, we will truly be slaves to their will.
December 17, 201213 yr Once again, if a reason is because we have more guns why is fixing that not worthy of consideration? You, yourself said our abundance of guns is a reason these types of incidents happen more here than elsewhere. I'm not naive enough to think you can get rid of all guns. I realize there will be a black market. I'm neither a gun nor an anti-gun expert but I'm certain I've seen studies where banning them has helped elsewhere. I can't shoot a person with a joint. Apples and oranges... Drugs are the biggest reason for gun crime. No apples and oranges. Look at Chicago, they outlawed the sale and possession of handguns in 1982. In just one weekend in September alone there were at least nine people killed and 37 others wounded in shootings throughout the city. Now, feel free to check out how many shootings they had in that city alone just this year. So please, tell me how a ban has stopped shootings.
December 17, 201213 yr Believe what you want. "Arms" were not defined. Mr. Jefferson, define "assault weapons".
December 17, 201213 yr I don't agree with a lot of Obama's actions. However, I commend him for actually quoting scripture from the Bible within a school. Maybe this same action (quoting scripture) could be a remedy for the culture we live in. But most folks don't want this in their schools. It's easier just to blame guns...
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.