I can't say I could have overturned the call on the field and been 100% sure I was correct.

I can't say I could have overturned the call on the field and been 100% sure I was correct.

 

Understood

 

Still not definitive or indisputable. That's all I am saying.

 

But is it commonsensable.....

Correct. I think some of those who can't see it was a TD think the ball has to break the back of the white line.

 

Who has ever said that?

Who has ever said that?

 

Nobody came out and said that, but I don't see how you can say it wasn't a TD otherwise.

I don't see how anyone can say the ball didn't break the plane after watching that video. No doubt it was a touchdown.

 

Not even close. Easily was a TD.

Not even close. Easily was a TD.

 

It was really close. That's the problem.

It was really close. That's the problem.

 

Not really, he clearly crossed the line with the ball.

Edit...

 

Posted new photo...

Doesn't get much more clear than that. Guys hand is on the goal line where I started the line. I went straight up.

Dude, I just did the exact same thing. Was getting ready to post it but you beat me too it. :thumb:

Dude, I just did the exact same thing. Was getting ready to post it but you beat me too it. :thumb:

 

:lol: Great minds think a like. I was starting to think I was watching a different video than PP92 .

1. I got that pic last night.

 

2. It was taken from the 1 yard line. Of course it looks like he crossed the plane at the 1 yard line.

 

3. Did the replay officials get still shots or video? Still isn't clear or definitive to me.

 

4. Is that the ball or his arm?

^ That doesn't matter that guys hand is in the end zone. The line is straight up from his hand the ball is clearly across...

Either way, after replay, I thought he was clearly in. They replayed, which means the "experts" thought he was "clearly" in, and we haven't heard any scuttlebut about it today saying the wrong call was made.