Outstanding game!

Correct. I think some of those who can't see it was a TD think the ball has to break the back of the white line.

After watching the link from Hatz I'm not so sure it didn't break the back of the line. Anyone who can watch that and say there's nothing to overturn the call is blind.

Was rooting for Wisconsin, but the Spartans outplayed the Badgers and deserved to win the game. The last play was a touchdown in my opinion.

I absolutely agree. I am certain he got in....the fact that they overturned the on field call, strengthens the argument.

 

Yeah, because the replay officials always get it right.......(cue the Syracuse game in which the PAT was ruled good...by the replay officials when it was no good).

Video is at top of this article. You be the judge.

 

http://www.foxsportsdetroit.com/10/22/11/MSU-edges-Badgers-on-Hail-Mary/landing_msu.html?blockID=587720&feedID=3701

 

 

Ahhh, from foxsports...Detroit...... Show me video from foxsports.....Madison.....

There wasn't enough to overturn it in my mind. Nothing was a no doubter or clear on that play. Great game though.

 

That's my point. Indisputable. It was not indisputable.

After watching the link from Hatz I'm not so sure it didn't break the back of the line. Anyone who can watch that and say there's nothing to overturn the call is blind.

 

Indisputable or definitive. It isn't neither.

 

I do wear glasses and contacts though.

Correct. I think some of those who can't see it was a TD think the ball has to break the back of the white line.

 

Nope. In pictures and videos I have seen, I can't tell where the ball is. He catches it and the ball is moved back and then all I see is arms and white gloves. Where is the ball?

Wisconsin can blame that last play on the Head Coach. Why in the world was he calling timeouts under 1 minute? I think the TD was the right call but still cant beleive they over turned it.

 

I blame the db's who didn't knock it down. Knock it down......

Indisputable or definitive. It isn't neither.

 

I do wear glasses and contacts though.

Did you watch the video in that link? It is both indisputable and definitive and isn't even that close. How the ref blew it in real time is beyond me.

Did you watch the video in that link? It is both indisputable and definitive and isn't even that close. How the ref blew it in real time is beyond me.

 

No. I watched the game and all 100 replays afterwards. My buddy also sent me a still photo as well. How can 1 more video change my stance? I have yet to see one picture or replay in which I can identify the ball. That is my issue. I can't see the ball. I can't tell if it is the ball or his arm. I know white gloves were covering the ball and all I can see are white gloves. No ball.

It'll be hard to convince me it is indisputable unless someone can get me a live shot along the goal line in which the ball can be properly identified. Every replay or picture isn't from the goal line so the angle is all messed up as to where the ball truly is.

Nope. In pictures and videos I have seen, I can't tell where the ball is. He catches it and the ball is moved back and then all I see is arms and white gloves. Where is the ball?

 

Well it's not in his stomach, it's not levitating, so it's probably in his hands which are a part of those gloves. C'mon PP92, it's not that complex.

It'll be hard to convince me it is indisputable unless someone can get me a live shot along the goal line in which the ball can be properly identified. Every replay or picture isn't from the goal line so the angle is all messed up as to where the ball truly is.

I didn't watch it live and have only seen the video in Hatz's link...that was all I needed. The angle isn't perfectly down the goal line but it's close enough to tell the ball was in.

Well it's not in his stomach, it's not levitating, so it's probably in his hands which are a part of those gloves. C'mon PP92, it's not that complex.

 

Still not definitive or indisputable. That's all I am saying.