February 21, 201115 yr My inclination was to believe that you felt I felt that way ... which would be par for the course, the way you routinely misinterpret my positions. If you think it, just come out and say it and remove all doubt.And par for the course you assumed what you wanted from my post. If I thought it, believe me, I'd have zero problem telling you so.
February 21, 201115 yr Still more: This one is at least somewhat creative... :lol: I wonder if the media will take issue with this one...
February 21, 201115 yr Author I'm just waiting for them to call the union supporters whack jobs like they have the tea party for the last few years. Those signs are as bad as any I have seen posted of tea party members.
February 21, 201115 yr And par for the course you assumed what you wanted from my post. If I thought it, believe me, I'd have zero problem telling you so.No, I didn't assume anything ... that is why I asked. If I only got the same consideration ...
February 21, 201115 yr Isn't that the same instance that Tom DeLay brags about resdistricting Texas to benefit the Republican Party? Absolutely. The Dems for years while they were in the majority gerrymandered districts to suit themselves. Both sides do it, I never said otherwise. The difference now appears to be that when Democrats lose their ability to ram their agenda down our collective throats and are in a position that they may have to swallow a little like a bunch of whiney little kids they take their marbles and go home.
February 21, 201115 yr Absolutely. The Dems for years while they were in the majority gerrymandered districts to suit themselves. Both sides do it, I never said otherwise. The difference now appears to be that when Democrats lose their ability to ram their agenda down our collective throats and are in a position that they may have to swallow a little like a bunch of whiney little kids they take their marbles and go home. You mean like using the filibuster, instead of actually having a vote?
February 21, 201115 yr The filibuster in within the rules of the Senate, in fact I remember clearly the minority Dems praising it while using it to block GWB's judicial nominations. I guess that sort of action is justified, right? You don't like it change the rules. That the Dems in WI are doing is outside the rules of their body. That's why they have fled to Ill.
February 21, 201115 yr No, I didn't assume anything ... that is why I asked. If I only got the same consideration ... Consideration? I didn't assume anything either, you just assumed I did...
February 21, 201115 yr I'm just waiting for them to call the union supporters whack jobs like they have the tea party for the last few years. Those signs are as bad as any I have seen posted of tea party members.No doubt! I'm waiting to hear some condemnation about the one with cross-hairs in particular...
February 21, 201115 yr Consideration? I didn't assume anything either, you just assumed I did...Again, you're wrong. If I had assumed, I wouldn't have asked the question. Some of us actually ask questions to glean the answer, not to make a point.
February 21, 201115 yr Again, you're wrong. If I had assumed, I wouldn't have asked the question. Some of us actually ask questions to glean the answer, not to make a point. Except I did answer, you just didn't like my answer. I don't tailor my posts to your liking. The answer was there - "did I say westsider thinks breaking peoples heads when they cross a picket line is a good thing". What's so hard to understand? :idunno: Can we move on now and get back to the thread?
February 21, 201115 yr Author No doubt! I'm waiting to hear some condemnation about the one with cross-hairs in particular... I agree on the cross-hairs sign. I normally don't put much stock in rhetoric being dangerous but in this instance I think you would be a full to not think it could be dangerous. Especially considering what happened in Arizona and in the context it is being used. No other conclusion could be reasonably reached for that sign.
February 21, 201115 yr I agree on the cross-hairs sign. I normally don't put much stock in rhetoric being dangerous but in this instance I think you would be a full to not think it could be dangerous. Especially considering what happened in Arizona and in the context it is being used. No other conclusion could be reasonably reached for that sign. :thumb: I'm not a big fan of any of the Nazi signs, either.
February 21, 201115 yr Except I did answer, you just didn't like my answer.No, it wasn't an answer. Again, a total misinterpretation. Now ... back to the thread.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.