September 30, 200916 yr On the positive side, she said it in England, with whom we were NOT at war. So it's okay that she qualifies for those that we are not war, our president is a moron and he does not have our support from the people? Even though most dems are supporting it at that time?
September 30, 200916 yr :thumb: When we are at war, it is signifigantly different! Aren't we still at war? I'm assuming you are similarly as disgusted with Palin?
September 30, 200916 yr So it's okay that she qualifies for those that we are not war, our president is a moron and he does not have our support from the people? Even though most dems are supporting it at that time? Aren't we still at war? I'm assuming you are similarly as disgusted with Palin? Technicality Nazi time: Not officially at war as only Congress has the power to declare war.
September 30, 200916 yr Technicality Nazi time: Not officially at war as only Congress has the power to declare war. Then we weren't when the Dixie Chicks said their piece, either.
September 30, 200916 yr Then we weren't when the Dixie Chicks said their piece, either. The Iraqi invasion had yet to begin at the time she made the remark (which some of them seemed to overlook when I noted it earlier).
September 30, 200916 yr The Iraqi invasion had yet to begin at the time she made the remark (which some of them seemed to overlook when I noted it earlier). You're right, it was a week or two before, wasn't it?
September 30, 200916 yr So it's okay that she qualifies for those that we are not war, our president is a moron and he does not have our support from the people? Even though most dems are supporting it at that time? If you are referring to the vote in Congress, just enough Dems voted for the measure for it to pass. The majority of Dems did NOT support (via their votes) the measure. In Congress, 147 Dems voted to oppose the Iraq War Resolution (126 in the House, 21 in the Senate), while 111 voted in favor (82 in the House, 29 in the Senate). Only 7 Republicans voted against the measure, compared to 263 were in favor.
September 30, 200916 yr Then we weren't when the Dixie Chicks said their piece, either. Alrighty then! I say this issue is moot on the grounds that the reason everyone hates the Dixie Chicks doesn't even have "legs". :lol: No war then, no war now, not in a country that we were at war with.....
September 30, 200916 yr Because the overwhelming majority of country music fans are conservative. I think that's an important point to keep in mind when considering the Dixie Chicks situation, and especially when comparing the reaction they got with other bands/musicians like Pearl Jam and Neil Young.
September 30, 200916 yr If you are referring to the vote in Congress, just enough Dems voted for the measure for it to pass. The majority of Dems did NOT support (via their votes) the measure. In Congress, 147 Dems voted to oppose the Iraq War Resolution (126 in the House, 21 in the Senate), while 111 voted in favor (82 in the House, 29 in the Senate). Only 7 Republicans voted against the measure, compared to 263 were in favor. :notworthy: You caught me with my foot in my mouth again.:lol: As for TBG's question, I don't have a problem with a politician blasting another under many circumstances. If a politician goes into a foreign country and blasts the president on his foreign policy for that country, I would have a major problem with it. I am not thrilled that Palin is blasting Obama in a foreign country, but the DCs offense was on a different level in my eyes.
September 30, 200916 yr :notworthy: You caught me with my foot in my mouth again.:lol: As for TBG's question, I don't have a problem with a politician blasting another under many circumstances. If a politician goes into a foreign country and blasts the president on his foreign policy for that country, I would have a major problem with it. I am not thrilled that Palin is blasting Obama in a foreign country, but the DCs offense was on a different level in my eyes. Why? Maines did not blame our country for the collapse of the world's economy. Is "downing" our country better than downing our president?
October 1, 200916 yr Why? Maines did not blame our country for the collapse of the world's economy. Is "downing" our country better than downing our president? Because we had 4 digit citizens assassinated in one day, and we chose to respond to it. European nations and citizens were nervous about the reaction, so Maines chose to play off of their sympathy.
October 1, 200916 yr This is what happens when people forget the 4 digit assasinations / murder. Sympathy. I am still angry and will be so until the day that I die!
October 1, 200916 yr Because we had 4 digit citizens assassinated in one day, and we chose to respond to it. European nations and citizens were nervous about the reaction, so Maines chose to play off of their sympathy.Our response was our action against the Taliban in Afghanistan. Our invasion of Iraq had very little to do with 9/11, except that 9/11 was used to sell it to the American people.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.