January 15, 200917 yr Read the thread about the Nazi named children being removed from their home. An article on-line this moring said that the local agency had no bad reports on the family. So were they remove for political correctness? Next they come for your guns. Then they arrest you for reading the wrong book or watching the wrong TV show. They will be able to this because society has lost its abilitity to stop an abusive government. I read about that. It was in Farenheit 451.
January 15, 200917 yr We all have noticed how quick some in our government are to smirk at the NRA, BUT did you know that most every Firearms Instructor in every department that falls under the DOJ requires their instructors to be NRA certified. Also most states require concealed carry holders be certified through an NRA instructor. It hasn't been to many years ago that gun safety instruction was available in our schools through our state conservation officers. Even the mention of "GUN" in a school now is not politically correct. We currently have over 22000 (TWENTY TWO THOUSAND) gun laws on the books , I would love to see them use these laws against All illegal activity. We really do not need any more gun laws.
January 15, 200917 yr Author You assume that you know who I voted for ... He's entitled to his opinion, and I don't entirely disagree with it. Which makes him and you, since you admittedly agree with him, anti-gun. We gun owners don't need this kind of mentality infringing on our rights, in fact, we're quite tired of it.
January 15, 200917 yr Author And the ability to own a gun without regulation will change that how? :confused:Again, guns have been regulated to the hilt, it's getting tiresome. The only people these idiotic laws effect are people that don't break the law to begin with.
January 15, 200917 yr Author We all have noticed how quick some in our government are to smirk at the NRA, BUT did you know that most every Firearms Instructor in every department that falls under the DOJ requires their instructors to be NRA certified. Also most states require concealed carry holders be certified through an NRA instructor. It hasn't been to many years ago that gun safety instruction was available in our schools through our state conservation officers. Even the mention of "GUN" in a school now is not politically correct. We currently have over 22000 (TWENTY TWO THOUSAND) gun laws on the books , I would love to see them use these laws against All illegal activity. We really do not need any more gun laws. :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:
January 15, 200917 yr Author Your answer is immaterial to the question I asked. I asked specifically how would registration lead to confiscation.Ask that question of citizens of those countries that had to register first, then had their gun confiscated.
January 15, 200917 yr How in the world does owing a gun and not having to give a fingerprint solve the issue? I get so tired of the "look at what society has become" excuse. Fix the problem, don't add to it. Moral values can be changed. But it takes more than the lamenting of the lack thereof. God hasn't been removed from the forefront. But, many people choose to not put God in the forefront. As much as I wholeheartedly believe in the value of the Catholic Education for my kids, even if they'd gone to public school, God would have been in the forefront. Don't blame the government for removing God. So tell me, Rockmom, exactly what gun problem is it that we need to fix and how will this new law accomplish that? And you never answered my one question - do you feel the Brady Law has been effective?
January 15, 200917 yr RTS, I am so very happy that many of mine are pre 68.... if you know what I'm refering to.!!
January 15, 200917 yr Author RTS, I am so very happy that many of mine are pre 68.... if you know what I'm refering to.!!I do indeed. :thumb:
January 15, 200917 yr I really don't know why they haven't thought of this one : just create a new law that requires anyone that has used a firearm in commission of a crime , or intends to use a firearm in any illegal manner to turn in their firearm ASAP ! Or at least , have them come in for finger printing so they can be properly dealt with after they commit a crime ! Oh yea, finger print anyone that purchases duct tape for illegal purposes too !:rolleyes:
January 15, 200917 yr So tell me, Rockmom, exactly what gun problem is it that we need to fix and how will this new law accomplish that? And you never answered my one question - do you feel the Brady Law has been effective? My comment isn't about "gun problems". My comment is about the excuse that guns are NEEDED because "society is debased, degraded and degenerating, godless, etc". That doesn't get solved by having guns. It doesn't get worse because you have your name in a database if you do own a gun. I am continually amazed at the "solution" that a gun is supposed to be....in reality, it's no solution at all.
January 15, 200917 yr I really don't know why they haven't thought of this one : just create a new law that requires anyone that has used a firearm in commission of a crime , or intends to use a firearm in any illegal manner to turn in their firearm ASAP ! Or at least , have them come in for finger printing so they can be properly dealt with after they commit a crime ! Oh yea, finger print anyone that purchases duct tape for illegal purposes too !:rolleyes: This almost appears as if you are being sarcastic.
January 15, 200917 yr Which makes him and you, since you admittedly agree with him, anti-gun. We gun owners don't need this kind of mentality infringing on our rights, in fact, we're quite tired of it. Pro-gun control is NOT Anti-gun. It's just a convenient lable to apply to those who feel that there are changes that should take place. Again, it's like during the campaign...our opinions don't jive, so call me a "bad" name to justify it.
January 15, 200917 yr So tell me, Rockmom, exactly what gun problem is it that we need to fix and how will this new law accomplish that? And you never answered my one question - do you feel the Brady Law has been effective? I never specifically replied to any of your posts, so I didn't realize you were waiting on a response from me.
January 15, 200917 yr The bill sounds reasonable to me, too. If we want to talk about itchy trigger fingers, let's talk about the decision to go to Iraq. Yes, seriously, thanks alot to all of you that made up the over 70% of Americans that felt that we needed to go over there.....
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.