Just heard Chris Wallace ask if John McCain was aware that Gov Palins' daughter was pregnant. The reporter responded that he was aware of this, but did not see it as a problem.

 

Still think she was prpoerly vetted?

 

Just wondering, how old was Obama Mom, when he was born, and was she married prior to being pregnant?

 

The answer:

The couple married on February 2, 1961 in Maui, Hawaii.

On August 4, 1961, at age 18, she gave birth to her first child whom she named Barack Hussein Obama II.

So Obamas Mom was with child before she married the father!

 

So to discredit Palins' family, you must discredit Obama family! Do you really think he will make this an issue? I think not!

http://news.aol.com/elections/conventions/republicans/article/palin-says-daughter-17-is-pregnant/155019?icid=100214839x1208349022x1200476587

 

 

Can you imagine if she had decided to not keep the baby?

 

It'd be a big shake up.

If ifs and buts were candy and nuts...

So to discredit Palins' family, you must discredit Obama family! Do you really think he will make this an issue? I think not!

 

Who has "discredited" Palin or her family?

http://news.aol.com/elections/conventions/republicans/article/palin-says-daughter-17-is-pregnant/155019?icid=100214839x1208349022x1200476587

 

 

Can you imagine if she had decided to not keep the baby?

 

Can you imagine, if Obama Mom, in the same situation, decided not to keep her baby?

Who has "discredited" Palin or her family?

 

No one has and I didn't say someone did, but......

No one has and I didn't say someone did, but......

 

But, what?

Just wondering, how old was Obama Mom, when he was born, and was she married prior to being pregnant?

 

The answer:

The couple married on February 2, 1961 in Maui, Hawaii.

On August 4, 1961, at age 18, she gave birth to her first child whom she named Barack Hussein Obama II.

So Obamas Mom was with child before she married the father!

 

So to discredit Palins' family, you must discredit Obama family! Do you really think he will make this an issue? I think not!

 

Where is that "Tangled Webb and family values" now?::lol:......Game Over, thanks for playing. Thanks for posting this oldguy.

Alan Colmes, who I have defended in the past, alleged that Palin had failed to provide proper prenatal care to her son by flying to Anchorage after her water broke. The implication was that Palin was somehow responsible for her son's autism, despite the fact that his condition had already been diagnosed weeks before.

Sarah Palin's baby son has Down's Syndrome. That is a genetic disorder, NOT a birth injury. There was nothing she could have done...except to make the rare and admirable decision to not destroy this special child.

Just wondering, how old was Obama Mom, when he was born, and was she married prior to being pregnant?

 

The answer:

The couple married on February 2, 1961 in Maui, Hawaii.

On August 4, 1961, at age 18, she gave birth to her first child whom she named Barack Hussein Obama II.

 

So Obamas Mom was with child before she married the father!

 

So to discredit Palins' family, you must discredit Obama family! Do you really think he will make this an issue? I think not!

 

 

This is the same guy who called his grandmother "a typical white person." If you will do this to the person that raised you, then yes, I do believe that if it means winning the election, Obama will throw his mom under the bus. It's easier to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission.

Edited September 2, 200818 yr by rockmom

Can you imagine, if Obama Mom, in the same situation, decided not to keep her baby?

 

:sssh::sssh: They don't like in when they are exposed....

But, what?

 

But...if he does or someone from the Democratic party does, it would be a huge mistake, considering his own family history!

Sarah Palin's baby son has Down's Syndrome. That is a genetic disorder, NOT a birth injury. There was nothing she could have done...except to make the rare and admirable decision to not destroy this special child.

I know - that is my point. Obama's minions have been just making stuff up and this is one of the internet smears to which Palin was referring. The other one was the ridiculous theory that Palin was not the mother of her infant son. The people who engage in such fabrications to win elections are the lowest form of life - next to the baby killer/sympathizer at the top of the Democratic ticket.

 

Obama's actions to protect hospitals engaging in genocide will become a huge issue in this campaign.

 

I can also see liberals attacks on Palin and her daughter causing a backlash among women who have found themselves in similar situations in their own lives. This is dirty politics and it is stupid politics on the part of the Obama shadow campaign.

This is the same guy who called his grandmother "a typical white person." If you will do this to the person that raised you, then yes, I do believe that if it means winning the election, Obama will throw his mom under the bus. It's easier to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission.

The same guy who said that he would not want his teenage daughter punished with a baby.

Edited September 2, 200818 yr by rockmom

OK. I've seen the Palin story crawl on CNN below the hurricane coverage. I have watched Fox News for 20 minutes. Nothing. Not that I'm surprised. Can't wait to see how each network spins this. Fox News will paint Bristol as having courage and blame the Dems for making too big a deal about this. MSNBC and CNN will compare her to Jamie Lyn Spears and stir the pot.

 

Regardless, I expect the story to be sickening at some point in terms of their coverage.

OK. I've seen the Palin story crawl on CNN below the hurricane coverage. I have watched Fox News for 20 minutes. Nothing. Not that I'm surprised. Can't wait to see how each network spins this. Fox News will paint Bristol as having courage and blame the Dems for making too big a deal about this. MSNBC and CNN will compare her to Jamie Lyn Spears and stir the pot.

 

Regardless, I expect the story to be sickening at some point in terms of their coverage.

 

In total agreement!