June 5, 200818 yr I agree with you on McCain. I respect and admire him, too. However, I keep telling myself that I cannot vote solely based on the amount of respect I have for someone. The road to my decision (for whatever it is worth) is going to be a long one, I am afraid. As is mine, I am not crazy about some of Mccains policy either, just that I have absolutely NO respect for B.H. Obama and the fact that Obama will be the Dem cantidate has made it much shorter in that I am sure that I will not be taking that route. As bad as I hate to I am considering the other option......."None Of The Above" That's what he is though. There is no way around it, Obama is a socialist. He may not be but imo some of the people that he has surrounded himself with over the last 20+ years along with his wife certainly are.
June 5, 200818 yr It amazes me that the anti-Obama clan keeps throwing around the "socialist" buzz word in every thread, no matter if it is appropriate to the topic or not. And I will keep on throwing it because I believe it is completely appropriate. Any pun intended with the choice of the word clan?
June 5, 200818 yr He is a great communicator of optimism and hope. In a time when nation needs to feel good about itself again. (Remember Roland Reagan was an actor.) True but Ronald Reagan was also governor of California for 8 years before he spent 5 years running for president, so he had a bit of a history to back up his words. I do think that Obama matches anyone in conveying a new spirit in politics. My concern is whether he can back it up.
June 5, 200818 yr And I will keep on throwing it because I believe it is completely appropriate. Any pun intended with the choice of the word clan? No...I don't imply much. I state what I feel. Note that the word starts with a "C" and not a "K," if that is what you are getting at. Keep throwing the buzz word around, if you choose. Just know that it does nothing but deaden the appeal of your posts to an undecided voter such as myself.
June 5, 200818 yr Someone made a list, or did you just choose to ignore it? Actually I wrote this post after reading the response that chastized the originator for having the gall to start another thread about the Socialist Obama.
June 5, 200818 yr What are you implying? I believe he is insinutating that your "anti-Obama clan" remark equates to the Ku Klux Klan.
June 5, 200818 yr Or in his case and as most that can read through his lines this is called a great distributor of "el toro poo poo" That is simply an idealogical difference. You certainly can disagree with any policy, but that doesn't mean the policy is a lie. For example I think it is much worse that the republicans have been running on platforms that they don't match there actions.
June 5, 200818 yr What are you implying? Just trying to understand why you chose the word clan, that's all.
June 5, 200818 yr Just trying to understand why you chose the word clan, that's all. I believe he is insinutating that your "anti-Obama clan" remark equates to the Ku Klux Klan. Evidently was editting my orignal post as you all typed these...please see above.
June 5, 200818 yr No...I don't imply much. I state what I feel. Note that the word starts with a "C" and not a "K," if that is what you are getting at. Keep throwing the buzz word around, if you choose. Just know that it does nothing but deaden the appeal of your posts to an undecided voter such as myself. Thanks, I will. If my use of the word socialist really has any impact on your voting decision then I have more sway then I realized.
June 5, 200818 yr He is a great communicator of optimism and hope. In a time when nation needs to feel good about itself again. (Remember Roland Reagan was an actor.) So is Tony Robbins, does that mean you would vote for him?
June 5, 200818 yr I find it very interesting that not one single legit qualification has been listed.
June 5, 200818 yr Adolf Hitler was a great communicator and brought about change and unity in his nation when they were in desperate need. Not that I'm comparing Hitler to Obama.
June 5, 200818 yr I find it very interesting that not one single legit qualification has been listed. 8 years in the Illinois Senate 3 in the U.S. Senate Law Professor Civil Right Attorney I guess that legit is in the eye of the beholder.
June 5, 200818 yr I guess that legit is in the eye of the beholder. Do you honestly believe those four things make someone qualified to be President of the United States? We are talking about the number one, most important job in the world. And those four things make him qualified?
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.