January 20, 200818 yr Brady has an awful game and the Patriots still win. :lol: Chargers can say what if in the off season as they couldn't get touchdowns in the red zone.
January 20, 200818 yr The Bolts were too beat up going into this game... I don't see anyone beating the Cheaters...:irked:
January 20, 200818 yr I am confused about LT, I thought he was good to go,what happened to keep him on the sidelines?
January 20, 200818 yr I don't see any NFC team knocking these Pat's off.. The NFC representative will probably not win but I don't see anything special today with what the Pats did to make the NFC feel that way.
January 20, 200818 yr The Chargers' inability to convert turnovers into TD's did them in today. The Patriots' O definitely not that impressive but the Chargers' D had a lot to do with that.
January 21, 200818 yr I am confused about LT, I thought he was good to go,what happened to keep him on the sidelines? He said he was 90%, Im shocked he didnt play.
January 21, 200818 yr The NFC representative will probably not win but I don't see anything special today with what the Pats did to make the NFC feel that way. How do you see that? The Pat's showed that even if their best player doesn't show up and play that great, they can still get it done. They showed how good their running attack can be. Brady is the man when the Super Bowl comes around, I don't see him throwing 3 picks in the big game..
January 21, 200818 yr I think either the Packers or Giants could beat the Pats in the Super Bowl. I honestly doubt it, you probably thought the Giants could a few weeks ago and they couldn't. Even if its close like the last time the Pats have been down a few times in the 4th this year, they just know how to finish. Thats why they are 18-0.
January 21, 200818 yr Bruschi holds Gates in the end zone... Vrabel KICKS Rivers on the Samuel INT... it's whatever though. Two huge missed calls but probably wouldn't have changed the outcome. Pats redzone D was the difference.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.