We are all in a consipracy against you.

 

:lol::lol:

 

(It is not being paranoid if they really are out to get you) That is my philosophy. LOL

The thing that gets me everytime is that this is a great discussion but little do people realize is that we are witnessing the murder of a human being on tape. It is truly a sad moment.

 

I agree, not to mention seeing and/or knowing that it was the man's brains that were splattered all over the car and his wife.

 

2: If there was NO conspiracy,then why did Jack Ruby risk his freedom and his life to kill Oswald..point conspiracy

 

 

:thumb: Very good point, I had not thought of that angle.

 

2: If there was NO conspiracy,then why did Jack Ruby risk his freedom and his life to kill Oswald..point conspiracy

 

 

He was nuts like Oswald, Hinkley, Sirhan Sirhan, etc, etc, etc.

He was nuts like Oswald, Hinkley, Sirhan Sirhan, etc, etc, etc.

 

Ruby was there to take care of Oswald in case Oswald wanted to started chirping.

Ruby was there to take care of Oswald in case Oswald wanted to started chirping.

Sure he was.

I really have never made up my mind on this..I guess it's something that I love to ponder on from time to time..there are two conflicting facts that keep me from making my decision.

1: At that short distance,with a shell already in the chamber (He had to work the bolt TWICE...not 3 times),a master marksman could have made the shot at least 2 out of 3 times and probably all 3. Oswald was NOT a master marksman,but the distance and time should have allowed him to make at least one. Point..no conspiracy.

 

2: If there was NO conspiracy,then why did Jack Ruby risk his freedom and his life to kill Oswald..point conspiracy

 

...and the game still goes on

Wonder why he did it.

Come on, you expect us to believe that Hollywood puts out false information in their supposed historical fiction films. :sssh:

 

Next thing you will be saying is that Michael Moore's films has no truth to it until the credits begin.

 

:lol::lol::lol:Classic!!

Where is Dale Gribble when you need him???

 

Hank and Boomhower have him tied up in the basement!!

Come on, you expect us to believe that Hollywood puts out false information in their supposed historical fiction films. :sssh:

 

Next thing you will be saying is that Michael Moore's films has no truth to it until the credits begin.

 

:lol::lol::thumb: Maybe Moore should make a documentary/film on this and conduct seminars and make the talk show rounds with his Hollywood buddies. I am sure that the main stream media would be willing to help as well . This would be by far the best way to finally put this to rest.:thumb:

Would be easy to tell if he was lying...........his lips would move.:sssh:

 

If the shot came from behind why did his head snap back and to the left? Jackie isn't going for help when she crawls across the trunk, she is getting the side of the Presidents head that had just be blown off. I have also been to Dealy Plaza, the car is not only going away from Oswald but is going downhill at the same time and slightly turning as it goes. So we are to think he fired three shots in 8 seconds at a target moving away, down and turning all at the same time, and he scores two hits.

I am just waiting for someone to blame this on GW.

Now that you mention it....he was in Texas at the time....hmmmmm

Now that you mention it....he was in Texas at the time....hmmmmm

 

Conspiracy or just coincidence?:sssh::banana:

 

If the shot came from behind why did his head snap back and to the left? Jackie isn't going for help when she crawls across the trunk, she is getting the side of the Presidents head that had just be blown off. I have also been to Dealy Plaza, the car is not only going away from Oswald but is going downhill at the same time and slightly turning as it goes. So we are to think he fired three shots in 8 seconds at a target moving away, down and turning all at the same time, and he scores two hits.

 

 

My point exactly:thumb:

I really have never made up my mind on this..I guess it's something that I love to ponder on from time to time..there are two conflicting facts that keep me from making my decision.

1: At that short distance,with a shell already in the chamber (He had to work the bolt TWICE...not 3 times),a master marksman could have made the shot at least 2 out of 3 times and probably all 3. Oswald was NOT a master marksman,but the distance and time should have allowed him to make at least one. Point..no conspiracy.

 

2: If there was NO conspiracy,then why did Jack Ruby risk his freedom and his life to kill Oswald..point conspiracy

 

...and the game still goes on

 

Ruby did not go there that day with the intention to kill Oswald. He had a little dog in the car with him that he dearly loved, according to his friends.

He left the dog in the car when he went in the building. The police didn't pay him much attention because he was visiting there all the time, bringing them sandwiches and such. He liked to keep them as friends because of his business as a strip club owner. If he had been planning a murder he would not have brought his beloved dog along. It was simply a spontaneous action. His brother said he told him that Oswald had a "smirk" on his face, and that's what set him off. He pulled his gun and shot Oswald. No conspiracy, just a man that was not all there in the first place, and had a violent side to him anyway.