October 9, 200718 yr Doesnt matter if he plays or not. Uk has the chance that stanford would have against USC of beating LSU..................oh wait! I know you're just being flippant, but I'd say a 9 point dog at home has a marginally better chance of winning than a 38 point dog on the road. Just throwing that out there.
October 9, 200718 yr UK has great depth at RB, so I don't see his absence as crippling. He's our best back, but I have plenty of confidence that Dixon and Locke can step in and fill the void with little drop off. Little has been injury prone his whole career, so we know how to play without him. The main thing is that whoever is playing RB needs to hold on to the football. That's what scares with Dixon...he shows great promise running the ball but he has been fumbling far too frequently. At this point, if Little isn't in, I'm most comfortable with Derrick Locke. I've been really impressed with him thus far. I really like Dixon's talent, but you can't have a guy who fumbles every 10 touches.
October 9, 200718 yr I read the thread title like this: "UK's A little questionable for Saturday's LSU game". I was thinking, of all seasons to think about NOT showing up, this isn't the one... :sssh:
October 9, 200718 yr This does not help UK at all. But we will get to see what Locke can do against one of the best defenses in the country as he will get more carries.
October 9, 200718 yr I know you're just being flippant, but I'd say a 9 point dog at home has a marginally better chance of winning than a 38 point dog on the road. Just throwing that out there. :laugh::laugh: There is always one in every crowd :lol:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.