September 23, 200719 yr Defense played well again and Wille Parker had another 100 yards. :dancingpa :dancingpa 3-0 and at Arizona next week.
September 23, 200719 yr If I'm the teams in their division, I'm really worried about the Steelers defense right now.
September 23, 200719 yr How was the catch by Vernon Davis ruled a non-catch? What didn't happen? When the ball shot up like a bottle rocket, they thought the ground caused it. I am glad the Steelers are peaking early.
September 23, 200719 yr When the ball shot up like a bottle rocket, they thought the ground caused it. . Had to be something else because it was 100% obvious that ball never touched the ground.
September 23, 200719 yr Had to be something else because it was 100% obvious that ball never touched the ground. I was pretty upset about that call too. Didn't see how that could have been incomplete. Plus hes on my fantasy team and it lost me those yards.:lol:
September 23, 200719 yr I was pretty upset about that call too. Didn't see how that could have been incomplete. Plus hes on my fantasy team and it lost me those yards.:lol: I'm asking because there must be something to the rule that was interpreted but not announced. He had possession to the ground. Both feet hit the ground. Is it the "make a football move" portion of the rule?
September 23, 200719 yr I'm not so sure that they didn't have some other view, and I'm not sure that the ball didn't hit the ground, otherwise if it wasn't a catch simply due to the "football move" rule, it should have been an interception. So, I assume they had a view of the ball on the ground. I'll be in Phoenix next weekend 5 rows from the field, hopefully to see the Steelers improve to 4-0.:thumb:
September 23, 200719 yr I am glad the Steelers are peaking early. Peaking early? Wishful thinking on your part....
September 23, 200719 yr I'm asking because there must be something to the rule that was interpreted but not announced. He had possession to the ground. Both feet hit the ground. Is it the "make a football move" portion of the rule? From my perspective, unless theres something in the rules that I'm unaware of... that looked like a catch and then he was down to me.:thumb:
September 23, 200719 yr Had to be something else because it was 100% obvious that ball never touched the ground. I don't think the ref saw it that way... you and I did.
September 23, 200719 yr I don't think the ref saw it that way... you and I did. Different color stripes! :lol:
September 23, 200719 yr Different color stripes! :lol: I thought it was an INT. But I can understand if the ref didn't look closely enough why he thought the ground caused it.
September 23, 200719 yr When the ball shot up like a bottle rocket, they thought the ground caused it. I am glad the Steelers are peaking early. We will take the early so called peak because that makes us 3-0. Gonna be a long year for the Bengals.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.