March 1, 200719 yr Your post nicely sums up the whole reason I registered Independent. When it came down to it, I simply could not stomach putting either (D) or ® next to my name. It all came down to a philosophical rebellion against both major parties, primarily for the reasons you outline above. We agree. Not surprised.
March 1, 200719 yr So you're saying that you think the members of BGP combined do more than Gore when it comes to global warming? Let me know next time you devote your own money to flying around the globe educating people on the issue at hand. Not to mention the various governments that have invited him to consult them and help start new programs. You're right though, he doesn't do very much... Having a farm IS a legit justification for having a big truck as well as having to meet clients IS a legit reason to drive a car. Just as having appointments across the globe on a daily basis IS a legit reason to use a private plane. Maybe Gore should catch a passenger ship next time he goes to Japan and you should use a Hybrid car for your farm work... First of all, as to the bolded part of your post, I have no way of knowing the answer to the question so I won't guess. But I bet you don't know the answer either. And is it conserving energy or global warming that we are comparing Gore vs the BGP membership to? You used two different tests in the posts. With either one however, you can not flat out make the statement that you did as fact, as you can't know for certain either way. And I'm glad that you feel I am justified in having a big truck since I own a farm. What concerns me if folks like Gore get into office is that fact that I may need to get his permission to keep it however. The libertarian in me cringes every time I hear this guy talk. And as to the part of your post where you stated "You're right though, he doesn't do very much..." I want to point out that I never stated that he doesn't do much, now did I? Nope, I didn't. Rather I simply stated that you cannot factually know that Gore has done more to conserve energy than all of us on this site combined. It is impossible for you to know that as you don't know whom is on this board. What I posted is dramatically different than stating Gore hasn't done much.
March 1, 200719 yr An April 2001 article in USA Today described _________'s 4,000-square-foot single-story limestone house as an "eco-friendly haven." "Wastewater from showers, sinks and toilets goes into purifying tanks underground -- one tank for water from showers and bathroom sinks, which is so-called 'gray water,' and one tank for 'black water' from the kitchen sink and toilets," it said. "The purified water is funneled to the cistern with the rainwater." In addition, "the(y) installed a geothermal heating and cooling system, which uses about 25 percent of the electricity that traditional heating and air-conditioning systems consume." Who's house are we talking about? President Bush's Crawford, TX home, which is credited at being far more eco-friendly that Al Gore's home.
March 1, 200719 yr 9/11 is the main reason we should have elected Gore in 2000. President Bush has used 9/11 as an excuse for everything he has done since. He has hurt the long term security of the United States. Gore would have done MUCH better. What would he have done better? No one could ever possibly imagine the horrific events of 9/11 coming to play---but they did. I for one am glad that George W was at the helm!:ylsuper:
March 1, 200719 yr What would he have done better? No one could ever possibly imagine the horrific events of 9/11 coming to play---but they did. I for one am glad that George W was at the helm!:ylsuper: And GWB has done what? that was better??????
March 1, 200719 yr Author By the same token, does any of us really need a dwelling that is larger than the bare minimim needed to accommodate it's occupants? I mean, my father was raised in a 1 bedroom shack without electricity or running water with 12 other siblings. Your father's parents would have been a very responsible representative for a Global warming platform. They would have my respect and I would rally behind them and spread the word. Sadly Al Gore couldn't carry your father's parents values if he had a 5 gallon bucket to put them in. I'm more repsonsible with my energy use than Al Gore and I'm not even trying.
March 1, 200719 yr Author And GWB has done what? that was better?????? He took a stand, plain and simple. Something Gore, Carey, or Edwards wouldn't have done. They would have tried the "sanction" route. And then by the time that was over, we would be digging victims out of another pile of rubble.
March 1, 200719 yr Author What would he have done better? No one could ever possibly imagine the horrific events of 9/11 coming to play---but they did. I for one am glad that George W was at the helm!:ylsuper: I'm with you I4hounds.:thumb:
March 1, 200719 yr IMO Yes. He did the best he could with the information and supports he had at the time. Perhaps 9/11 would not even have been an issue if Clinton had pulled the plug on Osama Bin Laden when he had the chance. While I do not agree or even support everything Bush or his administration does (or did) I do think he did a better job than Al Gore could've ever hoped to do. Period.:walk:
March 1, 200719 yr He took a stand, plain and simple. Something Gore, Carey, or Edwards wouldn't have done. They would have tried the "sanction" route. And then by the time that was over, we would be digging victims out of another pile of rubble. Right there...there's no proof at all that this would happen if we didn't invade Iraq. None.
March 1, 200719 yr Right there...there's no proof at all that this would happen if we didn't invade Iraq. None. I bet that is what the Clinton administration said to justify not taking out Bin Laden when they had the chance.
March 1, 200719 yr I bet that is what the Clinton administration said to justify not taking out Bin Laden when they had the chance. :confused: How far back do you want to take this? Because I can take it all the way back to WWII if you want.
March 1, 200719 yr Author Right there...there's no proof at all that this would happen if we didn't invade Iraq. None. The three I mentioned give me a feeling that they don't have the stomach or the backbone to defend our great country.. You're right, I have no proof, but if their past practices lead my down my road. I'm curious, in your opinion, how would the following days that unfolded 9/11/01 if say Al Gore would have been the president. If you don't care; give me the scenerio.
March 1, 200719 yr :confused: How far back do you want to take this? Because I can take it all the way back to WWII if you want. Only back to Clinton. My argument doesn't work past that.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.