Jump to content


Paid Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

230 Excellent

About bulldog77

  • Rank
    Premium Member


  • Location
    No. Ky.


  • Interests
    Baseball, Travel


  • Occupation
    School Social Worker


  • Set Default Read Receipt for Private Messages

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I've done this awhile in several sports both in boys and girls and I could not possibly disagree with you more. Some sports, sure, most sports, not a chance. Not in a quality program of any sort anyway.
  2. Got mine and the only side effect I had was a craving for brownies. Well . . . that might have been there before, so . . .
  3. Wow. The list of my childhood heroes that have passed is getting longer seemingly almost daily. Gibson, Brock, Seaver, Sutton, Morgan, Aaron. Sad day for me.
  4. Evening? You have something against day drinking?
  5. Coach stipends have implications on more than just other coach's salaries. There are Title IX issues involved, general budgeting and others. Some of you are correct in stating this isn't college. And the booster money some are suggesting might be even more closely monitored than the general fund money for just these kind of reasons. There's this thing in public schools called "Red Book" that governs all expenditures and it doesn't compromise.
  6. Okay, I'll step up and say it. Hydrox are better. There. Beat me down.
  7. You cannot make decisions in a vacuum, much to the dismay of Mr. Tackett and you apparently. Cash Cow or not, there are dozens of other factors that had to be considered and, thankfully, were.
  8. So you think CovCath should be playing Heritage Academy in a regular season game?
  9. This is fun. I think someone alluded to this earlier, but it went right over everyone's head, but how about Coach Eviston. If you can't beat 'em, call 'em? Again, just for fun, why or why not?
  10. Just for fun. Why or why not Noel Rash?
  11. Could not disagree more with you. Deuce is correct on this one. Football, nor any other single activity is the measure of putting STUDENTS first. I don't like the decision from a coach standpoint, but there are valid reasons for the decision.
  12. I don't recall blaming anyone or citing any reasons. However, the fact of the matter is they haven't played a legit opponent. Intentions mean nothing. The question was "are they being overlooked." Clearly, to me, the answer is no. When they do play a quality opponent, I'll re-evaluate my opinion. Till then, eh.
  13. Actually it was encouraged but was ultimately left up to the discretion of each school district. You had to know that with the over=precaution that surrounds this whole ordeal that that was going to be the case. Again, I'm in disagreement with the process, but it cannot be a surprise to anyone. School districts are trying to protect their students AND themselves.
  14. Just an observation here, but, I guess now it's so much for the "just let them play, we'll do whatever we need to do" mentality? This isn't a surprise. The whole two-week quarantine after a positive case was in the plan all along. I disagree with the entire plan and have from the start, but it IS what was laid out beforehand right? Nothing new here.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.