February 2, 200719 yr Sure, just not a BCS bowl.I think 10-2 is the high end against that schedule for U of L. I'd call the low end 8-4.
February 2, 200719 yr I think 10-2 is the high end against that schedule for U of L. I'd call the low end 8-4. I agree, but I think they could go 7-5 on the low end. Losses to LSU and Florida at home and Georgia, UT and either Arkansas or USC on the road, with Arkansas being a little down next year.
February 2, 200719 yr I agree. I think Arkansas may be a little down next year.:thumb: What does LSU have coming back? Calling that Bayou Rock. :lol:
February 2, 200719 yr Well, your wrong. Kentucky would lose to WVU, and one against Rutgers or UL. They would beat EVERYODY else. They would beat either Rutgers or UL, probably UL since we will be doing that anyway this year. Really? Wow, thanks for letting me know that. Since you're positive that Im wrong, maybe you should come to Derby with me and win me some money... UK would more than likely lose to WVU, RU, UC. Possible losses would include MTSU, and NC State.... I really wish a birth in a second-tier bowl game boosted my expectations for my team like it has for several UK fans.
February 2, 200719 yr Well, your wrong. Kentucky would lose to WVU, and one against Rutgers or UL. They would beat EVERYODY else. They would beat either Rutgers or UL, probably UL since we will be doing that anyway this year. They had a hard time beating UC's new coach when he was in the MAC. And that was with the best UK team in quite a while. And I do believe UC's trip to the Ville went a little better than the UK trip last year. So I'll take my Cats over yours. There's three L's...
February 2, 200719 yr They had a hard time beating UC's new coach when he was in the MAC. And that was with the best UK team in quite a while. And I do believe UC's trip to the Ville went a little better than the UK trip last year. So I'll take my Cats over yours. There's three L's... :thumb:
February 2, 200719 yr They had a hard time beating UC's new coach when he was in the MAC. And that was with the best UK team in quite a while. And I do believe UC's trip to the Ville went a little better than the UK trip last year. So I'll take my Cats over yours. There's three L's... So because you would take UC over UK it makes it another loss? Well I'd take my Cats over yours :thumb:
February 2, 200719 yr So because you would take UC over UK it makes it another loss? Well I'd take my Cats over yours :thumb: I gave a few reasons supporting my claim. Where is yours???
February 3, 200719 yr I gave a few reasons supporting my claim. Where is yours??? Because you played a team closer? :lol: Or wait your new coach played us close :lol: Solid reasoning.
February 3, 200719 yr Because you played a team closer? :lol: Or wait your new coach played us close :lol: Solid reasoning. It was more than what was given in the post I quoted that didn't mention UC as a potential loss. UC returns 90% of a VERY good D and they are getting away from a very boring O. The new coach is better than the old one. They play well on the road and at home. I have plenty of reason to believe the UC program is at worst on par with UK right now. I still haven't heard a solid argument as to why UK would come to Nippert and win...
February 3, 200719 yr Is this where a U.K. fan is supposed to, jump in and hi jack a U.L. thread?? Sorry, couldn't resist:laugh: and this is my only comment on this U.L. thread. :sssh:
February 3, 200719 yr It was more than what was given in the post I quoted that didn't mention UC as a potential loss. UC returns 90% of a VERY good D and they are getting away from a very boring O. The new coach is better than the old one. They play well on the road and at home. I have plenty of reason to believe the UC program is at worst on par with UK right now. I still haven't heard a solid argument as to why UK would come to Nippert and win... UC certainly could be a potential loss, their program and UK's are pretty much neck and neck right now if you were to compare the two. I haven't heard a solid argument as to why UK wouldn't win at Nippert. It would be a very good game.
February 3, 200719 yr Sorry for getting off topic. Compared to other "elite" teams, this scheudle is weak.
February 3, 200719 yr Compared to other "elite" teams, this scheudle is weak. You can only play the people that agree to play you...Louisville tried to get bigger names, and nobody would bite...Not their fault.
February 3, 200719 yr Almost all of the top BCS schools have figured it out. Win your league, go undefeated in OOC play and you will probably play for the title. Look at Florida. Nobody with NC title aspirations is going to schedule Uof L OOC.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.