December 31, 200619 yr Lets look at their QB ratings. Brohm-160.5 Woodson-151.55 And wins. Brohm-9 Woodson-8 Both of them are big time players. Brohm IMO is the more consistent and it has shown by him putting up big #'s for consecutive seasons and the games that hes played. This argument is incomplete. It's not 1 guy playing (on either team). Both have supporting casts (their teams). Which QB had a better supporting cast (I would say FAR better)? Brohm. The fact that Woodson accomplished what he did with a SIGNIFICANTLY inferior team than Brohm shows me that Woodson is the better QB.
December 31, 200619 yr This argument is incomplete. It's not 1 guy playing (on either team). Both have supporting casts (their teams). Which QB had a better supporting cast (I would say FAR better)? Brohm. The fact that Woodson accomplished what he did with a SIGNIFICANTLY inferior team than Brohm shows me that Woodson is the better QB. I wonder when the sporting News, ESPN, etc. are going to fire Mortensen, Kiper, Landry, etc. and give you a call? :lol:
December 31, 200619 yr I wonder when the sporting News, ESPN, etc. are going to fire Mortensen, Kiper, Landry, etc. and give you a call? :lol: I didn't think anyone would notice that I was secretly auditioning for those gigs.
December 31, 200619 yr The fact that Woodson accomplished what he did with a SIGNIFICANTLY inferior team than Brohm shows me that Woodson is the better QB. Good...I am glad that the Cards and their second rate (but first round) QB can make a bowl game.
December 31, 200619 yr Good...I am glad that the Cards and their second rate (but first round) QB can make a bowl game. Second rate? I thought you would have a little higher opinion of Brohm. I guess your negativity is rubbing off on your own team now.
December 31, 200619 yr This argument is incomplete. It's not 1 guy playing (on either team). Both have supporting casts (their teams). Which QB had a better supporting cast (I would say FAR better)? Brohm. The fact that Woodson accomplished what he did with a SIGNIFICANTLY inferior team than Brohm shows me that Woodson is the better QB. Wait just a minute now... Your being logical.. To my knowledge that's not allowed in this debate, nor is using facts.
December 31, 200619 yr If you look at what I posted....thre'yre not tremendously consistent....going off against Texas State, then C. Michigan, struggling against Florida, LSU, going off against someone else, struggling again...know what I mean... ...cool thing is, they both are finishing the season rather hot. Louisville – 9/24 (37.5%) 231 yards, 3 TD Texas State – 13/20 (65%), 197 Yards, 1 INT, 3 TD Ole Miss – 22/34 (64.7%), 293 Yards, 3 TD Florida – 26/37 (70.3%), 210 Yards, 1 TD Central Michigan – 20/32 (62.5%), 266 Yards, 1 INT, 4 TD South Carolina – 18/31 (58.1%), 289 Yards, 1 INT, 1 TD LSU – 14/37 (37.8%), 1 INT, 151 Yards, 0 TD Mississippi State – 19/28 (67.9%), 284 Yards, 1 INT, 3 TD Georgia – 23/32 (71.9%), 204 Yards, 2 INT, 2 TD Vanderbilt – 29/42, 450 Yards, 4 TD La-Monroe - 25/35, 359 Yards, 3 TD Tennessee - 26/39, 282 Yards, 1 TD Clemson - 20/28, 299 Yards, 3 TD's (MVP)
December 31, 200619 yr I think that proves both of my points made.... If was erratic at times, but finished great.
December 31, 200619 yr EASTERN KENTUCKY - W Temple - W LOUISVILLE - Assuming the big two go pro, W, if they don't than L FLORIDA ATLANTIC - W Arkansas - L South Carolina - W Finally they get Spurrier LSU - W, the upset of the season as Georgia was this year. FLORIDA - L MISSISSIPPI STATE - W Vanderbilt - W Georgia - L Bulldogs get revenge in an ugly UK loss TENNESSEE - L So 8-4 or 7-5 depending upon what happens west on I-64.
December 31, 200619 yr Is it normal to overcome a 40+ point loss? 2005 Georgia 45 Kentucky 13 2006 Kentucky 24 Georgia 20 Not quite a 49 point swing but a 36 point swing is similar. UK will be a decided underdog but LSU does lose 26 seniors and probably Russell as well. Should be much better than a 49-0 game.
December 31, 200619 yr I guess you forgot that wins like that happen every decade at UK and not every year. :lol: UK doesn't often bring back 45 out of their top 51 players from an 8-5 team. This might be a little different than in the past.
December 31, 200619 yr UK doesn't often bring back 45 out of their top 51 players from an 8-5 team. This might be a little different than in the past. 45 of 51 players that got blasted 49-0 (and it could have been much worse, LSU starters were pulled right after halftime). I guess these guys are going to get a lot better while the Tigers will take the off-season off.
December 31, 200619 yr 45 of 51 players that got blasted 49-0 (and it could have been much worse, LSU starters were pulled right after halftime). I guess these guys are going to get a lot better while the Tigers will take the off-season off. LSU will be a whole different team next year, and not for the better IMO.
December 31, 200619 yr 45 of 51 players that got blasted 49-0 (and it could have been much worse, LSU starters were pulled right after halftime). I guess these guys are going to get a lot better while the Tigers will take the off-season off. A lot of those LSU starters won't be there next year.. UK's will, with another year of experience.
December 31, 200619 yr LSU will be a whole different team next year, and not for the better IMO. Based on what. It couldn't be based on year after year of top ten recruiting classes. Heck, the USA Today player of the year (QB) was redshirted two years ago and played in a mop up role (yeah, he played against Kentucky) this season. LSU is loaded. If you think the Tigers are in for a down year you might want to do a little research. I'd look somewhere else for that win. Don't be surprised if the Tigers beat ND in the Sugar Bowl and start next season ranked in the top 3 in the nation.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.