I can't believe how many people think that they are going to beat Louisville now. Louisville is flat dominating this series, and their offense should be sick again next year, add that to an improved defense...come on folks.

 

 

It's just happiness about the win last night. I think many many people still thinkUofL is the better team, you want the UK people to have confidence. It's good for the state of football

Sat., Sept. 1 EASTERN KENTUCKY - Home W

Sat., Sept. 8 Temple - Away W

Sat., Sept. 15 LOUISVILLE - Home L

Sat., Sept. 22 FLORIDA ATLANTIC - Home W

Sat., Sept. 29 Arkansas - Away L

Sat., Oct. 6 South Carolina - Away L

Sat., Oct. 13 LSU - Home L

Sat., Oct. 20 FLORIDA - L

Sat., Oct. 27 MISSISSIPPI STATE - Home W

Sat., Nov. 3 Open

Sat., Nov. 10 Vanderbilt - Away W

Sat., Nov. 17 Georgia - Away L

Sat., Nov. 24 TENNESSEE - Home L

 

5-7 or 6-6 most likely but I am going to go with my heart over my brain and hope for 7-5.

 

Try doing this, rank UK's opponets best to worsts

1. Florida

2. LSU

3. Arkansas

4. TN

5. UL

6. SC

7. GA

8. Vandy

9. MS St

10. FL Atlantic

11. Temple

12. EKU

Then why aren't we seeing Woodson projected as a high draft pick this year. If it was true then

 

this statement is totally false. Woodson's numbers came against a schedule that was bought and paid for to get him gaudy numbers, nothing more , nothing less.

 

Woodson has not had the publicity that has been following Brohm since high school. This was his breakout season and look for him to be projected as a high draft pick next year.

 

Your statement about UK's schedule is completely false. I just looked at the final BCS ratings. UL's schedule strength was ranked 36th. UK's, 12th. I'll break that down a little farther for you. It means that Woodson put up better numbers, against better competition, than Brohm did at UL this season.

 

Bought and paid for? What a joke.

 

But who needs facts when we could just type whatever we want?

While you're crunching numbers how about taking into acount that Brian missed a few games.

 

Woodson played 13 games, to Brohm's 10, and he'll play his 11th later this year. He had 15 more touchdowns and just two more interceptions. So, overall, Brohm would have to have 5 touchdowns a game for the two that he missed, and his game against Wake.

 

Temple, Middle Tennessee, and Connecticut? Doesn't Temple have the nations longest losing streak?

 

"Bought and paid for?" Wow, you know nothing.

 

Louisville had a better overall team than that of Kentucky this season, so why wouldn't they win?

Put up Woodson's numbers against the SEC competition he faced and then put up his number against the various directional schools that UK paid for in order to get bowl eligible.

 

Your blue blockers are working way to well.

In SEC:

15 TDs

5 INTs

2,163 YRDs

 

OoC:

13 TDs

2 INTs

1,053

 

Bowl:

3 TDs

299 YRDs

0 INT

 

I guess those stats keep my point. Maybe you should have asked for different stats.

Put up Woodson's numbers against the SEC competition he faced and then put up his number against the various directional schools that UK paid for in order to get bowl eligible.

 

Your blue blockers are working way to well.

 

Done.. There is nothing to compare.. The numbers are basically the same with the exception of the LSU game. EVERY other game this season his QB rating was over 125. So yeah, he had one bad game against SEC competition. Yesterday against Clemson (a non-directional school) he had a QB rating of 196.5, his highest rating of the season.

 

Anything else?

Put up Woodson's numbers against the SEC competition he faced and then put up his number against the various directional schools that UK paid for in order to get bowl eligible.

 

 

Im still trying to figure out who UK paid to get bowl eligible? That statement is quite comical and shows your true colors.

Your statement about UK's schedule is completely false. I just looked at the final BCS ratings. UL's schedule strength was ranked 36th. UK's, 12th. I'll break that down a little farther for you. It means that Woodson put up better numbers, against better competition, than Brohm did at UL this season.

Whoa, whoa, whoa brother....you can't lump all of them into one basket....the big dawgs that helped UK's schedule:

 

U of L (of course if UK were in the Top 5 that would help the 'Ville)

UT, UF, and LSU....all 4 were losses....that's not very good. I'll put a win in there for you as well, UGA.

 

Woodson in those games:

 

U of L - 9/24 - 231 - 3 tds

UF - - - 26/37 - 210 - 1 td

LSU - - - 14/37 - 151 - 0 td, 1 int

UGA - - 23/32 - 204 - 2 tds, 2 int

UT - - - 26/39 - 282 - 1 td

 

 

That's not exactly lighting up the #12 schedule in the country...

 

His biggest games:

 

Texas State - 13/20 - 197 - 3 tds - 1 int

Ole Miss - 22/34 - 293 - 3 tds - 0 int

CMU - 20/32 - 266 - 4 tds

MSU - 19/28 - 284 - 3 tds - 1 int

Vandy - 29/42 - 450 - 4 tds

ULM - 25/35 - 359 - 3 tds

Im still trying to figure out who UK paid to get bowl eligible? That statement is quite comical and shows your true colors.

If you look below you look, you will find your answer....before the season EVERYONE admitted to UK dumbing down their schedule to help them....why doubt that now?

Woodson played 13 games, to Brohm's 10, and he'll play his 11th later this year. He had 15 more touchdowns and just two more interceptions. So, overall, Brohm would have to have 5 touchdowns a game for the two that he missed, and his game against Wake.

 

Temple, Middle Tennessee, and Connecticut? Doesn't Temple have the nations longest losing streak?

 

"Bought and paid for?" Wow, you know nothing.

 

Louisville had a better overall team than that of Kentucky this season, so why wouldn't they win?

Brian didn't play against MTSU....sorry you can't figure those out before you post....

 

...don't rehash a dead argument...Andre was great, is great, they both are.

Sat., Sept. 1 EASTERN KENTUCKY - Home Win 55-12

Sat., Sept. 8 Temple - Away Win 62-6

Sat., Sept. 15 LOUISVILLE - Home Loss 34-31

Sat., Sept. 22 FLORIDA ATLANTIC - Home Win 44-14

Sat., Sept. 29 Arkansas - Away Loss 28-17

Sat., Oct. 6 South Carolina - Away Win 35-24

Sat., Oct. 13 LSU - Home Loss 24-14

Sat., Oct. 20 FLORIDA - Home Win 31-24

Sat., Oct. 27 MISSISSIPPI STATE - Home Win 44-17

Sat., Nov. 3 Open

Sat., Nov. 10 Vanderbilt - Away Win 35-24

Sat., Nov. 17 Georgia - Away Loss 35-14

Sat., Nov. 24 TENNESSEE - Home Win 28-20

Brohm's "real games."

 

UK - 19/31 - 254yrds - 1 td

WV - 19/26 - 354yrds - 1 td

Rutgers - 13/27 - 163yrds -1 td - 1 int

 

Brohm's Stat Padders.

1,309yrds

10 TDS

3 INTS

 

AGAINST - Temple, Cincinnati, Pitt, and UCONN.

If you look below you look, you will find your answer....

 

Say what...?

 

I've looked all over this thread and still don't see WHO UK paid to become bowl eligible.

 

Even if they did come up with a bowl favorable schedule, what's wrong with that? I still don't see how they "bought" their way into a bowl game.

Pitt was considered viable...but whatever you say....most EVERYONE with authority in football knowledge says Brohm is one of the very special one's to come around.....I think Andre has done the most with all that he has, he will be an NFL QB one day, celebrate your QB.