The Top 5 QBs in the league when completely healthy:

1) Rodgers

2) Mahomes

3) Russ

4) Lamar

5) Brady

The Top 5 QBs in the league when completely healthy:

1) Rodgers

2) Mahomes

3) Russ

4) Lamar

5) Brady

 

Yes, Brady is a dog. He has no track record.:lol2:

 

Yes, Brady is a dog. He has no track record.:lol2:

 

[ATTACH]69290[/ATTACH]

 

Brady is like the Toby Keith song. He's not as good as he once was, but in a one game situation he can still be as good as he ever was.

Brady is like the Toby Keith song. He's not as good as he once was, but in a one game situation he can still be as good as he ever was.

 

OK, but last time I checked, he has lost only once this year (to Lamar) and ESPN still has the Pats as the #1 ranked team for now in Week 11. Personally, I'll take the known commodity until proven otherwise. And, by the way, I can't stand the Pats (or Brady).

I'm taking those guys based purely on experience. He's obviously a far superior athlete to all of them.

 

My point is I'd take 10 years of Lamar over whatever Brady, Brees and A-A-Ron have left.

My point is I'd take 10 years of Lamar over whatever Brady, Brees and A-A-Ron have left.

 

Well yeah, he's half their age. :lol2:

Yes, Brady is a dog. He has no track record.:lol2:

 

[ATTACH]69290[/ATTACH]

I think @Jumper_Dad summed up my thoughts on Brady better than I could. So ditto what he said.

:no::banghead::lol2:

 

Yep, Brady has nothing left...................playoffs should be interesting, especially the AFC ones.

:no::banghead::lol2:

 

Yep, Brady has nothing left...................playoffs should be interesting, especially the AFC ones.

Nobody is saying that.

Nobody is saying that.

 

I just like getting someone's GOAT once in a while.

 

Brady pun ^

I take Mahomes only because I think he would have been a good to great qb in any system not just Andy Reids. While with Jackson he is amazing. However, I think the OC they have was perfect for him and is known for being one of the best in designing a running game. He worked with Tyrod Taylor and Colik Kaepernick before that. So he has an offensive coordinator who knew the best way to use him. I think there are many teams Lamar could have went to, and teams wouldn't have used him the right way and we wouldnt be getting to see Lamar be great like this.

 

As much as I am mad that the Bengals didn't take Lamar and took Billy Price instead. Chances are the Bengals wouldn't have used him right, and this wouldn't even be a debate.

I'm just here for the reasons people wouldn't take Lamar.

 

The only one I can find is that Patrick is better. Lamar is great though.