October 18, 20187 yr No you don't only have the glove closing. I literally do not know what you are looking at if you can't see that his glove hits something that pushes it closed. Can you say 100% it was a hand, no...but it was something. You can see the glove start to move inward in the middle like something is pushing against it. He’s being a contrarian. I wouldn’t waste my time.
October 18, 20187 yr They think the fan shut his glove. I think the possibility that Mookie shut his glove early is very real. Show me the point of impact where the hand touched the glove. Save the sny remark about my vision because I literally just got my prescription updated last Tuesday. Haha :lol2: I’m not sure how much more any of us could do to prove it to you. I’ve got a brand new 65” Samsung and I can see it. Like I said, maybe you need a bigger tv
October 18, 20187 yr No you don't only have the glove closing. I literally do not know what you are looking at if you can't see that his glove hits something that pushes it closed. Can you say 100% it was a hand, no...but it was something. You can see the glove start to move inward in the middle like something is pushing against it. Yeah I don’t see what you’re seeing. I see the glove closing in a completely normal way like it would if he caught the ball not because it was hit against something.
October 18, 20187 yr :lol2: I’m not sure how much more any of us could do to prove it to you. I’ve got a brand new 65” Samsung and I can see it. Like I said, maybe you need a bigger tv Maybe so. I don’t know what else to say other then I don’t explicitly see anything hit the glove until after it’s closed.
October 19, 20187 yr Yeah I don’t see what you’re seeing. I see the glove closing in a completely normal way like it would if he caught the ball not because it was hit against something. Then I have no idea what you are looking at. Why would he close his glove before the ball is in it? He's looking at the ball so he knows where it is. To believe he just closed his glove on his own makes no sense.
October 19, 20187 yr Then I have no idea what you are looking at. Why would he close his glove before the ball is in it? He's looking at the ball so he knows where it is. To believe he just closed his glove on his own makes no sense. Like I said, I think he was anticipating contact and closed it reflexively. I don’t know exactly what happened on the play, but I’m just trying to look at this as objectively as possible. I’ve never said you’re wrong, I’m just saying I don’t see exactly where the contact is that causes the glove to close. I’m weighing all viable options here.
October 19, 20187 yr Maybe so. I don’t know what else to say other then I don’t explicitly see anything hit the glove until after it’s closed. Then I have no idea what you are looking at. Why would he close his glove before the ball is in it? He's looking at the ball so he knows where it is. To believe he just closed his glove on his own makes no sense. And Mookie himself said that he felt something push against his glove as he reached up for the ball. They can't go back and change it now so he has no reason to lie. In the end it doesn't matter. If the contact was made in the field of play it was interference. And there was definitely contact as Mookie went foot the ball. Where it occurred can certainly be debated but the contact as he goes for the ball is indisputable.
October 19, 20187 yr And Mookie himself said that he felt something push against his glove as he reached up for the ball. They can't go back and change it now so he has no reason to lie. In the end it doesn't matter. If the contact was made in the field of play it was interference. And there was definitely contact as Mookie went foot the ball. Where it occurred can certainly be debated but the contact as he goes for the ball is indisputable. False. Grant is objectively saying otherwise:D
October 19, 20187 yr And Mookie himself said that he felt something push against his glove as he reached up for the ball. They can't go back and change it now so he has no reason to lie. In the end it doesn't matter. If the contact was made in the field of play it was interference. And there was definitely contact as Mookie went foot the ball. Where it occurred can certainly be debated but the contact as he goes for the ball is indisputable. I mean what is Mookie really going to say? :lol2:
October 19, 20187 yr False. Grant is objectively saying otherwise:D I’m definitely saying it’s disputable. :lol2:
October 19, 20187 yr I mean what is Mookie really going to say? :lol2: He’s literally one of the best outfielders in all of baseball. He’s not going to just close his glove before the ball is there.
October 19, 20187 yr Here’s the deal. I’m as cynical as the next guy. If the call and subsequent corroboration of the call had been egregious, I’d be right there hollering “hosed”. “The fix is in”. “The networks want Boston”. It wasn’t egregious at all. The call was upheld, and NO ONE can say with absolute certainty that it cost Houston the game.
October 19, 20187 yr He’s literally one of the best outfielders in all of baseball. He’s not going to just close his glove before the ball is there. :idunno:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.