I offer as "Exhibit A" a stained dress.

 

 

 

 

 

Do you know George well enough to know that he hasn't possibly stained a dress or two since he's been in office? I wouldn't put anything past a Bush.

Do you know George well enough to know that he hasn't possibly stained a dress or two since he's been in office? I wouldn't put anything past a Bush.

 

Your the one who asked for proof. Care to address "exhibit B"?

 

By the way we will have to take Robertson's word for it because Vince Foster is well........... dead. A timely death at that.

I think it was that Republican idiot Falwell who even put together some kind of video(which you could have gotten for a "love" gift) linking the Clinton's to Foster's death. This dumb conspiracy theory has been debunked by most half-way sensible people although most right-wing conservatives try to keep it alive.

Bill was good; "W' has been bad. These Conservative wackos need to get over the fact of wasting four Presidential votes.

By the way we will have to take Robertson's word for it because Vince Foster is well........... dead. A timely death at that.

Suicides often are.

Bill Clinton didn't lie about a matter of national security. He lied about a personal and moral shortcoming that affected no one but him and his family.

 

I'm not saying that George W. Bush lied, but at the very least he and his administration used a national tragedy to further a controversial political agenda, a move that has cost this country dearly in terms of loss of life, money and valuable resources.

 

I'll accept the former before I accept the latter.

Bill Clinton didn't lie about a matter of national security. He lied about a personal and moral shortcoming that affected no one but him and his family.

 

I'm not saying that George W. Bush lied, but at the very least he and his administration used a national tragedy to further a controversial political agenda, a move that has cost this country dearly in terms of loss of life, money and valuable resources.

 

I'll accept the former before I accept the latter.

 

You ask for proof and then say that Clinton lied about a moral shortcoming. Was the short coming his extramarital affair or just lying? Do you need anymore proof?

 

If so how about impeechment? or a fine Cuban cigar?

You ask for proof and then say that Clinton lied about a moral shortcoming.

I didn't ask for proof of anything. You have me confused with another poster.

Bill Clinton didn't lie about a matter of national security. He lied about a personal and moral shortcoming that affected no one but him and his family.

 

I'm not saying that George W. Bush lied, but at the very least he and his administration used a national tragedy to further a controversial political agenda, a move that has cost this country dearly in terms of loss of life, money and valuable resources.

 

I'll accept the former before I accept the latter.

 

 

I concur.

My point is that I don't think any of us know these men well enough to say that Bush is more moral than Clinton. I think both of them have shown us that they are capable of unethical conduct. Is Bush more moral? I don't see it and it can't be proven.

Bill Clinton didn't lie about a matter of national security. He lied about a personal and moral shortcoming that affected no one but him and his family.

 

Since when did Paula Jones become a member of the Clinton family?

He lied about Monica Lewinsky ...

Let's bring this one back on topic.

World leaders do love Bill. Of course, world leaders aren't interested in pushing the interest of the United States. I wan't a leader as my president, and so does the bulk of the American people. It was visible in 2004 when the silent majority reelected GW. Make no mistake, when our country is in peril, the silent majority will come out and support people who are not idle and weak. Would you have really rather had Clinton in office during a time of military threat? Let alone Kerry?

YES....A THOUSAND TIMES YES!!!!!

World leaders do love Bill. Of course, world leaders aren't interested in pushing the interest of the United States. I wan't a leader as my president, and so does the bulk of the American people. It was visible in 2004 when the silent majority reelected GW. Make no mistake, when our country is in peril, the silent majority will come out and support people who are not idle and weak. Would you have really rather had Clinton in office during a time of military threat? Let alone Kerry?

 

Absolutely....I'll take Bill in war or peace.

I forgot the beautiful shade of purple slick turns when he's lying. Classic!

 

and Bush just smirks when he lies, thus the nickname.