I am not happy with either Clinton or Trump. :idunno:

Anyone?

 

Everyone wants to talk Politics, we are talking Politics, and no one is home.

In all seriousness, does the people want to be able to trust their president? And, if so, how can anyone trust Clinton?

Trump has a decent passing game but running game stinks. Clinton can move it on the ground but QB can't throw. Neither can play defense and coaching is pitiful for both. Shame that rather made the playoffs.

One cannot be trusted and repeatedly lies

One controls his emotions as if he's a child

 

Trump's lack of political experience does not bother me but the lack of patience when pressed does. A proud man pride tends to be his own downfall.

 

Clinton's political experience is overshadowed by her inability to be transparent, honest and uphold the governance of classified documentation.

 

The U.S. Is really in for a treat here. Focus on senate and house boys, this is a wash.

Now that's what I am talking about!

 

Any other opinions?

One cannot be trusted and repeatedly lies

One controls his emotions as if he's a child

 

Trump's lack of political experience does not bother me but the lack of patience when pressed does. A proud man pride tends to be his own downfall.

 

Clinton's political experience is overshadowed by her inability to be transparent, honest and uphold the governance of classified documentation.

 

The U.S. Is really in for a treat here. Focus on senate and house boys, this is a wash.

At some point people have to decide if they prefer the one with problems controlling his emotions, or the one that lies constantly and can't be trusted. Personally, if I can't trust you, I have no need for you. But, that's just me.

Anyone?

 

Everyone wants to talk Politics, we are talking Politics, and no one is home.

 

Hillary is a nut.

First time USA Today has ever endorsed a Presidential candidate.

 

USA TODAY's Editorial Board: Trump is 'unfit for the presidency'

 

In the 34-year history of USA TODAY, the Editorial Board has never taken sides in the presidential race. Instead, we’ve expressed opinions about the major issues and haven’t presumed to tell our readers, who have a variety of priorities and values, which choice is best for them. Because every presidential race is different, we revisit our no-endorsement policy every four years. We’ve never seen reason to alter our approach. Until now.

This year, the choice isn’t between two capable major party nominees who happen to have significant ideological differences. This year, one of the candidates — Republican nominee Donald Trump — is, by unanimous consensus of the Editorial Board, unfit for the presidency.

From the day he declared his candidacy 15 months ago through this week’s first presidential debate, Trump has demonstrated repeatedly that he lacks the temperament, knowledge, steadiness and honesty that America needs from its presidents.

#feelthejohnson

First time USA Today has ever endorsed a Presidential candidate.

 

USA TODAY's Editorial Board: Trump is 'unfit for the presidency'

 

In the 34-year history of USA TODAY, the Editorial Board has never taken sides in the presidential race. Instead, we’ve expressed opinions about the major issues and haven’t presumed to tell our readers, who have a variety of priorities and values, which choice is best for them. Because every presidential race is different, we revisit our no-endorsement policy every four years. We’ve never seen reason to alter our approach. Until now.

This year, the choice isn’t between two capable major party nominees who happen to have significant ideological differences. This year, one of the candidates — Republican nominee Donald Trump — is, by unanimous consensus of the Editorial Board, unfit for the presidency.

From the day he declared his candidacy 15 months ago through this week’s first presidential debate, Trump has demonstrated repeatedly that he lacks the temperament, knowledge, steadiness and honesty that America needs from its presidents.

Everyone wants to tell us why "Trump shouldn't be president", but why should Clinton be President? I think most of agree that we don't have one great choice, but why should we vote for Clinton?

Worst election ever made worse by Gary Johnson's recent actions.

Worst election ever made worse by Gary Johnson's recent actions.

There's no such thing as a third party candidate, and anyone that says there is is fooling themselves.

Everyone wants to tell us whey "Trump shouldn't be president", but why should Clinton be President? I think most of agree that we don't have one great choice, but why should we vote for Clinton?

 

Gonna be the lesser of two evils for a whole bunch of voters this time around. No doubt about it.

First time USA Today has ever endorsed a Presidential candidate.

 

USA TODAY's Editorial Board: Trump is 'unfit for the presidency'

 

In the 34-year history of USA TODAY, the Editorial Board has never taken sides in the presidential race. Instead, we’ve expressed opinions about the major issues and haven’t presumed to tell our readers, who have a variety of priorities and values, which choice is best for them. Because every presidential race is different, we revisit our no-endorsement policy every four years. We’ve never seen reason to alter our approach. Until now.

This year, the choice isn’t between two capable major party nominees who happen to have significant ideological differences. This year, one of the candidates — Republican nominee Donald Trump — is, by unanimous consensus of the Editorial Board, unfit for the presidency.

From the day he declared his candidacy 15 months ago through this week’s first presidential debate, Trump has demonstrated repeatedly that he lacks the temperament, knowledge, steadiness and honesty that America needs from its presidents.

 

USA Today has a great Sports section. The rest of the paper kind of stinks so who cares who they endorse.