Why is some blacked out.

 

It's not like it's a National Security document.

This is supposedly one of the cards being handed out.

 

[ATTACH]56663[/ATTACH]

 

Ive got one of those cards.

Is it still alleged recruiting if the players allegedly being recruited were allegedly already recruited to the other school in the first place?

No input, just want to keep track of this thread.

This has been a very strange thread to read. A lot of cloak and dagger stuff.

So Johnson Central is having a hard time fending off the recruiting efforts of a 1A school that has won a whopping two Regional Titles in the past 18 years?

 

Sounds about par for Johnson Central.

Honestly to me, it shouldn't matter. Why is the student-athlete the only one who gets punished for transferring? Coaches, administrators, teachers etc.., transfer within the district and out of it all the time and no repercussions. This applies at the collegiate level as well. There have been a couple of situations in the last couple years where Head Coaches agreed to become the HC of one school only to leave a couple weeks later to go to another school. Kids have 4 years in HS. They should be able to go where they want so long as their parents can get them there. Maybe it's a situation where the player and HC just don't get along. Or maybe the player is behind someone in the depth chart that is only a year older and they don't want to wait until their senior year to play. Shouldn't they have the same freedom to change as the adults have?

If I were the coach of one of these two schools I'd be leery of accusing the other school of trying to gain influence over some of my players that were originally someone else's players (by district only). :smug:

:popcorn:

I kind of find it amusing that an assistant coach has business cards.

I kind of find it amusing that an assistant coach has business cards.

 

unless they are for one sole purpose.

They have one D1 player and they are all the sudden a Factory?

Who said they are a factory