June 2, 201610 yr Geez. This administration will stoop to anything. Have to give Kirby props for admitting it. State Dept. admits intentionally altering video of Iran press conference | Washington Examiner
June 2, 201610 yr And yet the media stood silent. Who is going to speak up in the media? Katie Couric perhaps? She just got caught doing the same thing.
June 2, 201610 yr Author And yet the media stood silent. Except Fox. They were attacked by the rest of the media for being ridiculous for saying such a thing. A little egg on the face of the rest of the media. :clap:
June 2, 201610 yr Some are waiting to receive their DNC talking points, they will be along shortly to show you all the error of your ways.
June 2, 201610 yr There's a reason they don't want you to see it. They just didn't edit it out by accident. This is not a government of the people anymore, wake up these are your kings you stupid peasants.
June 2, 201610 yr Am I surprised a video was edited? Absolutely not. My guess is that almost everything like this would be edited before it was presented to the country as a whole. What surprises me is that it was done so shoddily. As to why it was edited, it's all speculation.
June 2, 201610 yr Geez. This administration will stoop to anything. Have to give Kirby props for admitting it. State Dept. admits intentionally altering video of Iran press conference | Washington Examiner Kirby had no choice. Evidently some folks in the State Dept with some morals were going to "leak" it out so he had to come out and admit it. Other questions...how many other times has this happened? Do they really think we believe that they know "someone" called the guy and ordered him to erase it but he does not remember who? Now if your kid came up with that excuse, you would immediately know he is lying. Either the guy is totally lying or this happens so often that he cannot remember who ordered it on this occasion. Either is NOT good. This administration is the most corrupt of any I can remember. It repeatedly lies to us on major issues (Obamacare, the Iran Nuke Deal, IRS, Fast and Furious, Benghazi, etc.) and often ADMIT they lied and so many just don't care...smh... Has anyone in this Administration ever been fired for the lying?? Maybe someone has but I cannot think of anyone...
June 3, 201610 yr Author Am I surprised a video was edited? Absolutely not. My guess is that almost everything like this would be edited before it was presented to the country as a whole. What surprises me is that it was done so shoddily. As to why it was edited, it's all speculation. Good Lord rjs!!! What was edited out? The State Dept. had basically admitted they had misled America on the Iran nuke deal. Can't have that coming out now can we. This administration lies and you guys swear to it.
June 3, 201610 yr Nixon deleted 18 minutes of audio and was forced to resign...now you can erase 30,000 Emails, edit videos to mis-lead the American public and flat out lie to Americans and you get held up as a savior or nominated to run for President.
June 3, 201610 yr Good Lord rjs!!! What was edited out? The State Dept. had basically admitted they had misled America on the Iran nuke deal. Can't have that coming out now can we. This administration lies and you guys swear to it. Maybe I'm missing something. And correct me if I'm reading it wrong. According to the article, The portion that was edited, was where the spokeswomen seemed to indicate that officials occasionally lie to protect national security. Let me repeat...seemed to indicate...not that she said officials do lie. According to the article her actual words were "needs privacy". Does privacy equal lying?? So yes the tape was edited. The article admits no one knows who requested the editing to be done, or why. Everything else is speculation or someone's opinion as to what someone meant, while what was actually said was kind of glossed over. And the actual question that was asked of the spokeswomen, was never given...only what the question dealt with. So what I see is speculation, heresay, opinions and interpretations with no real hard substance other than the fact that the tape was edited. I'm not going to get worked up over speculation. Also according to other sources on the issue, the full written transcript of the missing piece of tape was available and carried the full exchange that had been edited from the video.
June 3, 201610 yr Author Maybe I'm missing something. And correct me if I'm reading it wrong. According to the article, The portion that was edited, was where the spokeswomen seemed to indicate that officials occasionally lie to protect national security. Let me repeat...seemed to indicate...not that she said officials do lie. According to the article her actual words were "needs privacy". Does privacy equal lying?? So yes the tape was edited. The article admits no one knows who requested the editing to be done, or why. Everything else is speculation or someone's opinion as to what someone meant, while what was actually said was kind of glossed over. And the actual question that was asked of the spokeswomen, was never given...only what the question dealt with. So what I see is speculation, heresay, opinions and interpretations with no real hard substance other than the fact that the tape was edited. I'm not going to get worked up over speculation. Also according to other sources on the issue, the full written transcript of the missing piece of tape was available and carried the full exchange that had been edited from the video. You never see anything wrong with anything from the Left. I find fault with the Right. Usually on a daily basis. So glad I don't have to toe the party line.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.